I ran across this watch. The seller doesn't disclose much information about the in the listing. Given the age of the watch I assume this must be a redial.
I'm also not really sure what model this watch is...
I have no idea what reference it is either... I've got an upcoming trip to Europe and this is for sale in a local shop. I kinda assumed it was a redial due to overall condition but it seems it's possible it's not a redial?
The only information listed is that it is a caliber 320. The case is 35mm.
OP needs to see the case and rest of Watch. Was this in a sock drawer? Safe? In my short tenure I have seen really clean dials first accused of being redial then proved originals. This one is a puzzle.
It is very good but I think it's a redial. The flight of the arrow is all in one piece; there should be several separate "feathers".
This is a lovely looking watch but there are some very odd discrepancies
as Edward says - the arrow should probably be feathered (see my 2782 below)
the tacky numbers are serifed as they should be - except for the 6s and 9s
the two sub-dial numbers are in different fonts - one serifed the other not
-and the right hand sub-dial numbers aren't horizontal and level with the left one, as they should be
Bring me the guy who is capable to do such a redial!
IMHO it is a legit original dial and is consistent with the rest of the watch (as far it can be seen) - see the sharp edges on the lugs.
This does not look like an abused watch which had been redialed...