How accurate is your UG?

Posts
257
Likes
155
Having had a few hiccups with my 22295.1 recently I've been keeping an eye on it's timekeeping.
For the last week it has been spot on i.e. within a variaion of 1/2 secs it hasn't lost or gained.
Not bad for a 60 year old watch that I wear 24/7.
 
Posts
3,311
Likes
7,825
I don't time my UGs and I suspect that if I did, it would be a frustrating experience.....
 
Posts
3,311
Likes
7,825
I mean really, you expect these things to look pretty AND keep time?! Lol
 
Posts
13,139
Likes
52,195
Get em properly serviced and they run great. Watches that is.....
 
Posts
3,311
Likes
7,825
sorry to the OP, I'm not trying to derail your post.
I get OCD about all kinds of things on my watches, just not usually timekeeping, but I'm sure others monitor this more vigilantly and can weigh in......
 
Posts
977
Likes
3,093
I do not care about time keeping. I just want them to run fine and to be on my wrist under the sunshine. 😁
 
Posts
1,195
Likes
1,979
Having had a few hiccups with my 22295.1 recently I've been keeping an eye on it's timekeeping.
For the last week it has been spot on i.e. within a variaion of 1/2 secs it hasn't lost or gained.
Not bad for a 60 year old watch that I wear 24/7.
How you gage half a second ? How many positions ? Sounds questionable ?
 
Posts
13,139
Likes
52,195
Everybody back on the meds!
 
Posts
3,311
Likes
7,825
I think OP means that within a half second time period it doesn’t lose or gain
 
Posts
1,195
Likes
1,979
Positions are very important because of gravitational forces affect the balance wheel,. That is why turbillon gyrating balance wheel
theoretically is supeior in design for accuracy.
Also, there is the resistence of mechanical parts,
so vintage UG or any other vintage watch will gain or lose time. As a mainsping unwinds resistance changes, so accuracy is affected.
With that being said, fully wound automatics being worn ( constantly wound ) are more
accurate than manual wind !
 
Posts
1,195
Likes
1,979
Having had a few hiccups with my 22295.1 recently I've been keeping an eye on it's timekeeping.
For the last week it has been spot on i.e. within a variaion of 1/2 secs it hasn't lost or gained.
Not bad for a 60 year old watch that I wear 24/7.
Plus or minus ? Position could cause it to gain time, then you move it loses time, your saying on average ? If you set the watch down it being manual wind it has to either lose or gain time !
 
Posts
1,195
Likes
1,979
this thread is really ::facepalm1::
I think were all getting old and stuck in the analog world, I don't think any of us get looks from younger girls who get the most accurate digital time from gps on their cell phones !
Edited:
 
Posts
360
Likes
807
Get em properly serviced and they run great. Watches that is.....

I second this. Properly serviced some of these movements can function at chronometer standard.
 
Posts
257
Likes
155
How do you even measure 1/2 second, and no i don't use one of those machines
I should have said 1 or 2 seconds, fast or slow by an internet clock on my laptop.
 
Posts
1,195
Likes
1,979
I should have said 1 or 2 seconds, fast or slow by an internet clock on my laptop.
Yes, Ive timed watches this way, a very good reading to me on a vintage watch is plus or minus 2 seconds per day, IMHO .
 
Posts
3,311
Likes
7,825
I should have said 1 or 2 seconds, fast or slow by an internet clock on my laptop.

I understood perfectly well what you meant, just being silly. That is very accurate timing! I don't tend to wear my UG chronos, I just sit in a dark corner of my room staring at them like golem. I wear the time only more, but find them a bit erratic. This week I have one running great some days, and about five minutes slow other days. 🙁