Wibbles
·I wonder where some of that data comes from. I can't recall ever filling out a survey (or being asked).
I'd reckon their readership and especially their buyers are a lot more "average", middle class, middle management type folks. Many - if not most considering their overpricing of vintage stock - of whom would be new entrants in the more recent and wider crossover watch market, whose knowledge of watches would be fairly limited and they would rely on the site and its oft slick industry/dealer articles/promotions[delete as applicable] to make decisions regarding values for them. More longer term and informed watch hobbyists regardless of financial clout would view many of their values with suspicion. The "mil/billionaires" would either be more hunting for value(the majority I've known know the value of a penny) or would have their own personalised shopper. They might buy from outlets like that on a whim, or when the Burgundy is flowing of an evening.
They do have real clout in the market though and fair play to them on that score. In isolation. Whether such media/dealers are good for the hobby is another days work. The hype and dealer speak has increased significantly compared to a year or two ago, as have the runaway "values" of any watch model or brand value that they highlight.
In the end one takes ones choice regarding authenticity and value. Caveat emptor and all that.