Forums Latest Members
  1. Braindrain Feb 8, 2020

    Posts
    731
    Likes
    1,274
    I know nothing about them and came across this one. Weird thing is part of the case and mvmt are damaged to remove the Longines wording.

    Based on my cursory comparison of other pics off the net, it seems the case, dial, and crown are good (maybe 80% confidence level). Perhaps the hinge has been fixed.

    With the mvmt, it's a 13.33 and the serial matches the case and mvmt, but the mvmt numbers look iffy.

    Just seeing what folks think.

    Screenshot_20200208-123126_eBay.jpg Screenshot_20200208-123128_eBay.jpg Screenshot_20200208-123131_eBay.jpg Screenshot_20200208-123135_eBay.jpg Screenshot_20200208-123140_eBay.jpg Screenshot_20200208-123143_eBay.jpg Screenshot_20200208-123150_eBay.jpg Screenshot_20200208-123155_eBay.jpg Screenshot_20200208-123200_eBay.jpg Screenshot_20200208-123209_eBay.jpg Screenshot_20200208-123217_eBay.jpg Screenshot_20200208-123221_eBay.jpg
     
    gemstar likes this.
  2. DirtyDozen12 Thanks, mystery donor! Feb 8, 2020

    Posts
    2,686
    Likes
    4,618
    Authentic Longines dial but hour/minute hands are wrong, and the outer back should not detach from the case (hinge is broken). These factors, combined with the damaged movement mean that this example is best avoided.
     
    Larry S and minutenrohr like this.
  3. Braindrain Feb 8, 2020

    Posts
    731
    Likes
    1,274
    Thanks for the info and advice!
     
  4. oinkitt Feb 8, 2020

    Posts
    422
    Likes
    811
    The back is easily repaired.
     
    gemstar likes this.
  5. minutenrohr Feb 13, 2020

    Posts
    1,884
    Likes
    23,466
    Could be. But to mistreat one of the most beautiful movements this way? Every time I´d look at that watch, I´d think of what it looks like inside.
     
    Edited Feb 13, 2020
  6. Larry S Color Commentator for the Hyperbole. Feb 13, 2020

    Posts
    12,540
    Likes
    49,808
    As an owner, This just makes me so sad to see a beautiful and horologically important watch abused like this. From what I can see, the dial is in amazing shape too.
     
    DaveK likes this.
  7. Oku Feb 13, 2020

    Posts
    1,167
    Likes
    4,057
    Why do you think so? Because of its age? I know that they are usually seen with Breguet hands. But over the years I have also seen very many of the 13.33 with that dial and those leaf hands, but agreed mostly on later watches.
     
  8. minutenrohr Feb 13, 2020

    Posts
    1,884
    Likes
    23,466
    ...these hands (above) are too long. The minute hand should point on the minute track!
     
    Oku likes this.
  9. minutenrohr Feb 13, 2020

    Posts
    1,884
    Likes
    23,466
    like this:

    01.JPG
     
  10. Oku Feb 13, 2020

    Posts
    1,167
    Likes
    4,057
    Now that you said it...
    I just had a look at the form. ::facepalm2::
     
    minutenrohr likes this.
  11. minutenrohr Feb 13, 2020

    Posts
    1,884
    Likes
    23,466
    ...mine has a 477XXXX movement number (ca. 1928) while the example shown above has a 439XXXX number which points on +/- 1925.
     
  12. HS556 Mar 2, 2020

    Posts
    19
    Likes
    3
  13. gemstar Mar 2, 2020

    Posts
    256
    Likes
    436
    Beauty. Deserves to be brought back and it's not in bad shape at all.
    Seems like someone had a beef with Longines though.
     
  14. _awatchsnob_ Apr 25, 2020

    Posts
    62
    Likes
    15
    I personally would not pass this watch...
     
  15. Teddy Talc Apr 28, 2020

    Posts
    9
    Likes
    2
    I think you got it possibly wrong, it's not the hands that don't match the watch, it's the dial isn't original to the watch. Longines is removed everywhere except the most important place, the dial? Don't make a crap load a sense mate. Longines was removed from the original dial. You'd be lucky if the current dials genuine. This watch is scrap.
     
    Edited Apr 28, 2020
  16. DirtyDozen12 Thanks, mystery donor! Apr 28, 2020

    Posts
    2,686
    Likes
    4,618
    The dial is an authentic, Longines dial for the 13.33Z. It is difficult to prove whether the dial or hour/minute hands have been replaced, but they do not match.
     
    minutenrohr likes this.
  17. Teddy Talc Apr 28, 2020

    Posts
    9
    Likes
    2
    That withholding, be a damn fool to buy this lot. The dials about the only thing of value. Nothing can be done for the scared remains. Be desperate times before this be worth a buck.
     
  18. alphabeta81 Apr 28, 2020

    Posts
    74
    Likes
    113
    Nope, like DirtyDozen12 said - the dial is an authentic, Longines dial for the 13.33Z

    And it looks to be in great condition as well. That is worth a pretty penny if someone has a 13.33Z with a dial that has hairlines or worse.

    The hinge issue on the case can be fixed and you have a pretty good case too.

    Shame about the movement, of course. But let's not be dramatic and said "desperate times before this be worth a buck" unless you meant "before this be worth many many thousands of bucks" - because as is, the dial alone is worth 4 figures itself.
     
  19. Teddy Talc Apr 28, 2020

    Posts
    9
    Likes
    2
    Would you recommend putting your money into a watch that has had Longines removed from any identifiable part of the watch? This is one of the most vandalized watches I've ever seen.
     
  20. alphabeta81 Apr 28, 2020

    Posts
    74
    Likes
    113
    are we looking at the same dial? The dial is signed Longines and is correct (despite the wrong hands)