Citizaniac
·Is it a red flag if the word “automatic” is missing on
on an auto piece?
Is it a red flag if the word “automatic” is missing on
on an auto piece?
This one is nice and very original (what is the correct translation for "unverbastelt"?), never restored, good condition. 1971.
https://www.ebay.de/itm/255551938519
but it needs a service and a new gasket. (200-300€)
I would buy it for my own collection, but I have at least 5 Omegas laying around here waiting for restoration...
Thoughts on a Dynamic!
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/12535988...d3MMxCjSfC&var=&widget_ver=artemis&media=COPY
Thoughts on a Dynamic!
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/12535988...d3MMxCjSfC&var=&widget_ver=artemis&media=COPY
Thoughts on a Dynamic!
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/12535988...d3MMxCjSfC&var=&widget_ver=artemis&media=COPY
Here is a nice stainless steel seamaster cosmic (or did you settle against front loading watches? Sorry if you did) that pushes your price range (especially since it's not in the UK), but you might be able to ask the seller for proof that it's been serviced recently, as they state. The seller is also open to offers:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/1546116177...CsRVpgvTba&var=&widget_ver=artemis&media=COPY
The dial is reprinted.
It looks perfect, too perfect for me, especially compared to the hands. Why are the hands so worn but the dial is perfect? Then I saw the error: The dial says T Swiss T, but it has no lume on it.
.
I will confess to knowing nothing about Cosmics and it may well be a redial.
However, on a general note:
Hands often degrade while dials stay in pristine condition.
70s Omega dials frequently have Ts but no lume.
The hands on this example appear to have lume in the sections at the tips.
I have never seen this. And if, I wouldn't believe its original.
Then this is fake, redial or the lume has fallen off. In the latter case, you would see remains of the original lume.
The first T stands for the dial, the second T for the hands. So this one should have lume both on dial and hands.
I have never seen this. And if, I wouldn't believe its original.
Then this is fake, redial or the lume has fallen off. In the latter case, you would see remains of the original lume.
The first T stands for the dial, the second T for the hands. So this one should have lume both on dial and hands.