Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
ST3 👍
would be great if they (being omega) somehow gave preference to collectors for ordering this...ie those with both ST1&ST2 ...
Nothing really. The 321 is more “classical” in many ways, but real practical advantages are about zero. I know things like “more precise action” of the chronograph are thrown around, but really what does that mean? No freaking idea...
That movie was not supposed to float around I think. As it was done with a prototype, not with a final product. I have seen worse prototypes during Basel and SIHH, these things can happen. I think we can assume that production models will come without these flaws. Anyway, I wouldnt jump to conclusions based on prototypes, ever.
The definition of prototype, that is a first or preliminary version of a device which is being developed, hardly applies to a mass produced movement that has been on the market for nearly thirty years. The problem is simply related to the correct adjusting of the minute-recording jumper, a task taught in any training course at the time of my formation that I would imagine still is.
The thing is that anyone who has overhauled hundreds of this calibers when they were rightfully meant to be basic tools would find embarrassing such a flaw given the current publicity and the price point of this re-edition.
Did anyone on this forum purchase the platinum?
A few of us went the Gold 50th, I put my name down for the 321 platinum before it was shown but turned it down on seeing it (though only in pictures).
You can’t notice the difference between operating a cal 861 and a cal 321?
The definition of prototype, that is a first or preliminary version of a device which is being developed, hardly applies to a mass produced movement that has been on the market for nearly thirty years. The problem is simply related to the correct adjusting of the minute-recording jumper, a task taught in any training course at the time of my formation that I would imagine still is.
The thing is that anyone who has overhauled hundreds of this calibers when they were rightfully meant to be basic tools would find embarrassing such a flaw given the current publicity and the price point of this re-edition.
So you are saying that is what "more precise action" means? Just a difference in the feel of the pusher?
Sure, I can feel a difference but is the operation "more precise" with the 321? Does the column wheel make anything more accurate? Not in my view.
How do you define "precise" in the context of the feel of the operation?
Then, and here’s the ‘precise’ part, the chronographs with a shuttle cam appears to have a somewhat ‘jumpy’ seconds hand when you start the chronograph.
This is a potential issue on any horizontally coupled chronograph...cam or column wheel has no impact on this.
The platinum version will certainly not be easy to order, as it will come only in small quantities and the first once will determined only for selected customers.
Disagree, the few people who want one will easily get one through their OB, it’s not a limited edition. Limited capacity to produce the 321 yes but that capacity is well above any they’d sell in platinum.
The reason I withdrew my request for one is personally I feel the 50th Gold blew this out of the water, so wouldn’t pay significantly more for this platinum liking it a lot less then the gold.
Will potentially go the steel 321 if it’s not overdone eg hoping for a simple pre moon style speedy 321.
Disagree, the demand is high as it sounds. Only significantly fewer quantities will come onto the market. The first quantity should be very small and if one considers that it should be delivered worldwide, at the beginning only few will reach the respective countries. Less than 10 should come to Germany and so far I could always rely on the statements of my dealer.
I would like to be persuaded of the opposite, what say your dealer for availability?