Hands on with the new 2025 Planet Ocean

Posts
75
Likes
107
TL;DR: This is a watch to divide opinion - my own included - but overall, Omega is doing the right thing moving the model line forward.

I was lucky enough to be invited to Omega’s new Planet Ocean launch event in London last night. This is not a review of the watch (I use the title 'hands on' in jest), just some general impressions having seen the watches in person, and please excuse the poor quality photos!

First things first: these are beautiful watches. The quality really stands out: the tolerances (including the fit of the end links) are extremely fine, and the brushing, dial, hands, bracelet and bezel are all beautifully executed. It’s clearly machine-built, but in a good way, in the sense of being perfectly engineered rather than handcrafted, but it’s still a watch to admire on the wrist.

It moves the line forward. The original 1970s Ploprofs had no helium escape valve but needed a monocoque case. The improved seal technology of the Ultra Deep showed that a conventional case doesn’t need one either. I think it’s a good and logical step to bring that technology into the regular Planet Ocean range.

This will no doubt be a very capable dive watch. In the hand, it gives a feeling of being very well-engineered and solid, but at the same time it feels finely-made and almost jewel-like. I think the reason for this, aside from the bright boutique lighting, is because of the use of flat surfaces. The flat-link polished centre-link bracelet, the geometric edges of the lugs and end links, different angles of brushing used, and pretty flat crystal all combine to catch the light a bit like the facets of a gem. Not a bad thing, and probably far less obvious outdoors on an overcast day, but still it felt unusual to me in a dive watch. A different way of reflecting from what you’d expect even on a polished but more rounded case.

People have commented that these geometric case elements are reminiscent of Grand Seiko. Omega points to the 366.0858 as providing inspiration, and I would hope that Seiko does not have exclusive rights to crisp, geometric case shapes.

Still, the geometric lugs felt a little incongruous to me. This is a beautiful, well-engineered, dive watch, but the eye gets drawn to that angular area by the lugs (see the last photo on this post, courtesy of Omega). Omega’s lyre-case design is a classic, and Omega owners can happily while away dull conference calls admiring the lines of their watches. The new Planet Ocean’s case is striking in its own way, but one that felt to me slightly out of place on a 600-metre dive watch. It doesn’t feel particularly functional, and that pyramidal/triangular tip at the end of the lugs looked to me pretty exposed and vulnerable to knocks. Still, I guess there’s always the Ultra Deep in Titanium with its manta lugs for the true tool-watch fans, and maybe Omega will be brave enough to introduce something similar to the 600-metre line...

My favourite of the range is the black version. It looks serious but sporty, and you could easily wear it to work or on holiday. It carries more of a classic dive-watch character, especially on the rubber strap.

The size is very wearable. It feels no bad thing to see case sizes being reined in a bit, and this watch wears comfortably - not top heavy at all - on both the strap and the bracelet, which has a very decent taper. It will be interesting to see how the new lugs look on straps without the integrated end links.

In summary, I'd have loved to see simply a scaled-down version of the Ultra Deep - no helium escape valve, but the same lines. The new Planet Ocean so nearly is that, but to me, the reworked lugs and the flat-link, polished centre-link bracelet introduce details that aren't really needed on a 600m dive watch. But in any case, the impressive engineering quality shines through, and Omega moving the line forwards, not backwards, is great to see.
Edited:
 
Posts
233
Likes
687
It will be interesting to see how the new lugs look on straps without the integrated end links.

As an ex owner of a PO (ex, due to its thickness), I can appreciate all the improvements, that are almost in any area they change, except or I am in doubt what you say above.
I do not like integrated links...so I can't ask for a 100% improvement...let's wait and see...
 
Posts
75
Likes
107
It will be interesting to see how the new lugs look on straps without the integrated end links.

As an ex owner of a PO (ex, due to its thickness), I can appreciate all the improvements, that are almost in any area they change, except or I am in doubt what you say above.
I do not like integrated links...so I can't ask for a 100% improvement...let's wait and see...
Definitely - I'm sure we'll see soon!
 
Posts
83
Likes
151
Thank you for sharing ! As opinions will start flown in I’m very happy to see first real impressions from persons who got the watch in hands
 
Posts
75
Likes
107
Thank you for sharing ! As opinions will start flown in I’m very happy to see first real impressions from persons who got the watch in hands
Thank you - there's one member who has already bought one here:

 
Posts
11
Likes
6
And there goes Liquidmetal and ZrO2 dial. Also why they didn't use the O-megasteel? I was expecting more from the Omega's flagship diver.
 
Posts
75
Likes
107
I did wonder about the Liquid Metal and also asked at the event about the O-mega Steel - perhaps it’s to be one notch ‘below’ the Ultra Deep?
 
Posts
3,873
Likes
8,367
I really love that orange, but want to see the dial in person.
 
Posts
1,978
Likes
2,139
I really love that orange, but want to see the dial in person.
I'm told that the Portland OB got in a full-set! So, you might just go in and take a look!
 
Posts
35
Likes
24
I got mine yesterday, the blue bezel with the steel bracelet.
It is gorgeous the blue is not in-your-face like other brands, dial is great and I like the contrast between the two. The polished links are not too shiny but yes I would have preferred brushed.
What I would have liked is lumes on the bezel, for a dive watch, that's kind of necessary.

I have the 600M Summer Blue, the finishing of the model is much better, bracelet is totally a different level of quality (I had to change my summer blue old bracelet with a rubber strap pretty much straight away)

I would like them to do a rubber strap in matching blue colour (it is there in orange)
Basically, I'm very happy and never like the unnecessary feature that the HeV provided.

my 2c

PS:just a shame for the leak on Reddit but at least I could make my mind up ahead of time
 
Posts
75
Likes
107
I got mine yesterday, the blue bezel with the steel bracelet.
It is gorgeous the blue is not in-your-face like other brands, dial is great and I like the contrast between the two. The polished links are not too shiny but yes I would have preferred brushed.
What I would have liked is lumes on the bezel, for a dive watch, that's kind of necessary.

I have the 600M Summer Blue, the finishing of the model is much better, bracelet is totally a different level of quality (I had to change my summer blue old bracelet with a rubber strap pretty much straight away)

I would like them to do a rubber strap in matching blue colour (it is there in orange)
Basically, I'm very happy and never like the unnecessary feature that the HeV provided.

my 2c

PS:just a shame for the leak on Reddit but at least I could make my mind up ahead of time
Congratulations! It’s a really high quality watch - the finishing looked and felt amazing on all the models I saw. And the blue with white numerals looked great. It ticks so many boxes for me but I still feel I should love the geometric lug design more than I currently do.
 
Posts
150
Likes
2,402
that looks fantastic!!!!
Thanks. It look better than than the OG rubber using the OG end links, in my opinion. The reason might be the lugs that look kinda elegant without the end links as the polished chamfers accentuate the relative thin lugs.
 
Posts
62
Likes
162
I picked up the 4th Gen model just a few weeks ago, I have the orange-bezel / black rubber combination. This model is an outstanding addition to Omega's product lineup.

Just to echo what others have said, this watch does confirm the cliche that you have to see it "in the metal" to really assess. I was originally skeptical of the design when I saw the photos that were leaked online back in October 2025, but in person it does not disappoint.

One thing to note, the 4th Gen does not look or wear like a typical 42mm dive watch; it feels more like a 40mm watch. I've included a photo below showing the new PO next to the 42mm Fifty Fathoms, for comparison. I think the small feeling is attributable to a number of factors including the reduced lug-to-lug distance, the thinner and more compact case design, and the fact that the dial is visually "smaller" relative to the bezel (which tends to make dive watches look smaller). The bottom line is that the watch will appeal to people who tend to gravitate towards smaller dive watches, and if you like the 3rd Gen 39.5mm model, this has a similar feel on the wrist.

 
Posts
3,873
Likes
8,367
One thing to note, the 4th Gen does not look or wear like a typical 42mm dive watch; it feels more like a 40mm watch.

Indeed- it has a 40.8mm bezel diameter. I'm curious how it compares to the 2201.50, which has a 39.8mm or so bezel diameter, but a comparably smaller bezel to crystal ratio.

It's interesting how all these factors work into how we perceive size!
 
Posts
18
Likes
23
I never really got on with the last gen one, passing on the 39.5mm (too thick relative to its size) for an AT38 with the teak dial. I tried this new one on...and it's a significant improvement for me which wears significantly better, but being so angular it's a little more design-forward, with all that entails, so I figure it'll divide opinion more.

£7700 in the UK is a big chunk of change, too - even in today's market. Still, if they made one in blue on blue there's a part of me that would be sorely tempted.
 
Posts
9
Likes
13
It will be interesting to see how the new lugs look on straps without the integrated end links.

As an ex owner of a PO (ex, due to its thickness), I can appreciate all the improvements, that are almost in any area they change, except or I am in doubt what you say above.
I do not like integrated links...so I can't ask for a 100% improvement...let's wait and see...
Here is mine on Delugs,