JwRosenthal
·really ... ?? i really do not have that concern ..... here is my accutron astronaut .. paired with the JB Champion USA bracelet ...... it has never scratch the inside of the lugs ... ever ........
really ... ?? i really do not have that concern ..... here is my accutron astronaut .. paired with the JB Champion USA bracelet ...... it has never scratch the inside of the lugs ... ever ........
I really do not understand who started posting that concern concerning the end links damaging the inner surface of the lugs of a watch ... i can only confirm from personal experience using my JB Champion bracelets on several of my watches lug with 17mm thru
19mm and yes even on a watch who has 20mm lug width ... NEVER EVER have the end links damaged the inner surface of the lugs of any of my watches
The spring tension in endlinks of these Forstner is no where near what the old flexi’s were. I can push them back with my fingernail easily, not so with the older ones. The fear isn’t unfounded though
ahh perhaps with the bracelet u have i can see that ... but as far as i know from my personal experience the end links of the NASA bracelet has not damaged any of my watches ... again the NASA bracelet end links specific on any of my watches
I think there has been a blanket fear about these sprung endlinks as lug shredders for good reason- we see cases like the above all the time. And on sold gold watches it’s even worse as the metal is so soft.
The original cheap stretchy ones were designed to work on 18 (sometimes 16) through 22mm so on anything less then 22mm they exerted real outward force to cover the pins. The original JB’s only sprung out to 19mm anyway so there was a gap and no force on 20mm- they kind of rattled around. The current Forster’s are designed to cover up to 20mm so the force on the lugs is minimal at 20, and on 18mm (which I have tried) it’s there but not so much that I can’t push them back with my fingernail.
Remember that "base metal" cases, no matter what they are plated with, are very soft. Steel is much harder. You might see a wear mark on a steel lug, but no groove.
This is a common issue with any sort of spring loaded end link. The damage is most often seen on softer cases, like this one that is 18k gold:
However, stainless steel cases are also affected:
Since there is nothing on the end link to keep it from moving relative to the case (as there typically is with fixed style end links) the relative motion of the parts, plus the pressure from the spring will eventually damage the case.
I usually advise my customers to avoid this sort of spring loaded end link, and people here have developed various work arounds to protect the cases from damage, such as fitting O-rings between the end link and the case.
Cheers, Al
And finally, should the end links over the next few decades really slowly eat into the lugs, as shown in JW's and Al's pics: well, there are worse things in life. Do I really need that watch to outlive me?
What’s been your experience with metal on metal, in terms of wear, when the end-links do not have springs, vs when they do?
As I noted in my post on page 3, relative movement is an issue that compounds this wear. Most end links that are not spring loaded have some way of locking the end link to the case in a way that prevents that relative movement. On most it's a tab on the underside of the end link that contacts the underside of each lug. On the new 50th Speedmaster bracelet it's that bump on the end link that fits into a notch in the case.
The springs and that movement are what causes the wear. Since most end link designs don't move and don't have springs, the wear on the inside of the lugs just doesn't happen.