For the Hi-Fi enthusiasts among us...

Posts
13,696
Likes
53,498
Just purchased these 2 items

An AIWA XK-009 tape decks and a NAD C 427 Receiver.
Both are cosmetically perfect and appear to have minimal to no wear, price paid total US$60.00 for both.

Great deck. My tech will only work on 3 head units. It will need some cleaning and calibration no doubt.
 
Posts
4,739
Likes
47,604
Great deck. My tech will only work on 3 head units. It will need some cleaning and calibration no doubt.
I will have to dig around in my workshop to see if I can find my old test and alignment tapes so that I can make sure its all aligned up correctly.

Was only after the tape deck, don't see a lot of use for the receiver but there were 2 units in the auction lot so I guess it was a sought of a bonus, maybe I will sell it to recover some cash but at the price I paid for the tape deck I am not really concerned about that.

My usual deck is another 3 head unit the Yamaha KX-1200 so it will be interesting to compare.
 
Posts
285
Likes
854
Single Alpha 80 Evo for the desk and small office at home. Plenty volume for the space 馃榿

 
Posts
29,669
Likes
76,826
I have grown to hate surround receivers...

Our first one was an Arcam Diva A85 back in the very early 2000's, which lasted about 10 years I think. When it died, getting it repaired was going to be more than a new Denon,. so we bought a Denon. It again lasted about 10 years, and when it died we bought a Yamaha that had a 5 year warranty.

It dies within a year, needing a board replaced as the screen on the TV was sort of overlayed with green all the time.

Got it back and within a year it crapped out again, this time with no signal coming from the receiver to the TV.

Repaired again under warranty, and in about a year same thing - no signal. The dealer was good with getting it fixed, but this was beginning to be a hassle I didn't want to deal with anymore.

So even though it was still under warranty, I sprung for this (they had a sale on and I got a good discount by giving them back the Yamaha):



Anthem MRX 540 - Canadian company and hopefully one that will last at least 10 years, which seems to be the max life for this particular piece of equipment. Of all the audio and TV's I've bought, this is the piece of equipment that has failed the most. Most of my audio gear just keeps going and going, but the receivers seems to crap out pretty regularly. Anyone else find the same?
 
Posts
13,309
Likes
18,419
I dunno. I had a Yamaha surround sound system that I bought in 2004. Used it everyday for TV viewing and it lasted until 2024, when a small puff of white smoke signaled the end of its life.

I replaced with another Yamaha, this time from their Aventage line, RX-A780.

You must have gotten a lemon. It happens.
gatorcpa
 
Posts
3,947
Likes
6,767
30+ year old Sony. Denon 3801 upstairs is 25 or so years old. Denon never gets shut off. Have had newer Pioneers go kablammo in 10. Marantz so far so good, but was bought used at a thrift store. Fingers crossed.
 
Posts
4,739
Likes
47,604
Never had any issue with my Yamaha Aventage RX-A3040, it replaced a Sony unit which likewise no issues.
I've always been very happy with anything with the Yamaha name on it so a bit surprised to see you having so much issue with yours.
 
Posts
2,446
Likes
7,040
Of all the audio and TV's I've bought, this is the piece of equipment that has failed the most.
One thing to consider is how complex these units are. A two-channel amplifier is a very simple device in comparison. Home theatre receivers are everything-but-the-kitchen-sink when it comes to complexity.

My first unit was a Marantz (I think). It generally worked fine for at least a decade but a few inputs stopped working properly. I changed it about 5 years for a Denon AVR3700H ago because of standards started becoming obsolete. The Denon also has the Audyssey EQ which I use to optimize in-room audio response. I鈥檓 totally pleased with functionality of the Denon.
Edited:
 
Posts
1,829
Likes
12,458
I鈥檝e had 3 modern receivers in 30 years. First a 1997-ish Sony that lasted maybe 10 years until the rear surround speaker output died, then a Yamaha and another Yamaha, both from Costco. They have served me well. I also have a Marantz 2225 that bought used but restored and adore, but after sitting for 3 years unused, it developed a hum in the right channel that I can鈥檛 solve. There are no stereo repair shops here anymore and it would cost a fortune to ship it anywhere.
 
Posts
943
Likes
2,443
I have grown to hate surround receivers...

Our first one was an Arcam Diva A85 back in the very early 2000's, which lasted about 10 years I think. When it died, getting it repaired was going to be more than a new Denon,. so we bought a Denon. It again lasted about 10 years, and when it died we bought a Yamaha that had a 5 year warranty.

It dies within a year, needing a board replaced as the screen on the TV was sort of overlayed with green all the time.

Got it back and within a year it crapped out again, this time with no signal coming from the receiver to the TV.

Repaired again under warranty, and in about a year same thing - no signal. The dealer was good with getting it fixed, but this was beginning to be a hassle I didn't want to deal with anymore.

So even though it was still under warranty, I sprung for this (they had a sale on and I got a good discount by giving them back the Yamaha):



Anthem MRX 540 - Canadian company and hopefully one that will last at least 10 years, which seems to be the max life for this particular piece of equipment. Of all the audio and TV's I've bought, this is the piece of equipment that has failed the most. Most of my audio gear just keeps going and going, but the receivers seems to crap out pretty regularly. Anyone else find the
I am looking at replacing my outlaw processor and am looking at one of these. it鈥檚 nice and compact at least. I have in wall speakers for my surround system and really only need 5.1 channels. all of the processors out there have a million channels these days. Anthem has a minimalistic 5.1 surround receiver but it does not have line outs and very little power. But anyway, do you think the MXR 540 has enough power to drive some power hungry speakers? I have amps, but one box sounds pretty nice.
 
Posts
29,669
Likes
76,826
I am looking at replacing my outlaw processor and am looking at one of these. it鈥檚 nice and compact at least. I have in wall speakers for my surround system and really only need 5.1 channels. all of the processors out there have a million channels these days. Anthem has a minimalistic 5.1 surround receiver but it does not have line outs and very little power. But anyway, do you think the MXR 540 has enough power to drive some power hungry speakers? I have amps, but one box sounds pretty nice.
This is plenty enough to run 2 floor standing 3-way Tannoys for front R and L, plus a center channel, and two smaller Tannoy bookshelf speakers for the rears - subwoofer is powered. Plenty of volume for our use. This model is 100 WPC into 8 ohms, but they have more powerful models as well, up to 140 WPC.

If you have really inefficient speakers or a very large room it might not be enough, but I don't find it underpowered at all. At least not in the 3 days we have had it...
 
Posts
29,669
Likes
76,826
I dunno. I had a Yamaha surround sound system that I bought in 2004. Used it everyday for TV viewing and it lasted until 2024, when a small puff of white smoke signaled the end of its life.

I replaced with another Yamaha, this time from their Aventage line, RX-A780.

You must have gotten a lemon. It happens.
gatorcpa
Ours was also from the Aventage line - dealer said they are usually quite reliable, but admits this one has not been.
 
Posts
29,669
Likes
76,826
One thing to consider is how complex these units are. A two-channel amplifier is a very simple device in comparison. Home theatre receivers are everything-but-the-kitchen-sink when it comes to complexity.
Yes, clearly. But even things with mechanical components that do hard work (transports in CD and DVD players for example) the failure rate is not nearly as high for me personally. The dealer's repair guy basically said he hates HDMI and feels this is where the weak point is - all 3 of the failures of my Yamaha were related to the HDMI board.
 
Posts
13,696
Likes
53,498
I have grown to hate surround receivers...

Our first one was an Arcam Diva A85 back in the very early 2000's, which lasted about 10 years I think. When it died, getting it repaired was going to be more than a new Denon,. so we bought a Denon. It again lasted about 10 years, and when it died we bought a Yamaha that had a 5 year warranty.

It dies within a year, needing a board replaced as the screen on the TV was sort of overlayed with green all the time.

Got it back and within a year it crapped out again, this time with no signal coming from the receiver to the TV.

Repaired again under warranty, and in about a year same thing - no signal. The dealer was good with getting it fixed, but this was beginning to be a hassle I didn't want to deal with anymore.

So even though it was still under warranty, I sprung for this (they had a sale on and I got a good discount by giving them back the Yamaha):



Anthem MRX 540 - Canadian company and hopefully one that will last at least 10 years, which seems to be the max life for this particular piece of equipment. Of all the audio and TV's I've bought, this is the piece of equipment that has failed the most. Most of my audio gear just keeps going and going, but the receivers seems to crap out pretty regularly. Anyone else find the same?
My first was an Onkyo that went back twice for service. My next was an excellent Rotel that lasted 13 years but it was north of $3k and also the heart of my 5.1/2 Ch setup. My current is a Denon x 2800. Since I have separated my 2 CH from the 7.1, I hope that this new one lasts. Media changes and the inherent complexity make dropping $3k plus in these an iffy proposition. My new one was a grand. You do want quality amplification and current. I regard AVRs as fun but ultimately disposable appliances.
 
Posts
4,739
Likes
47,604
Yes, clearly. But even things with mechanical components that do hard work (transports in CD and DVD players for example) the failure rate is not nearly as high for me personally. The dealer's repair guy basically said he hates HDMI and feels this is where the weak point is - all 3 of the failures of my Yamaha were related to the HDMI board.

Any issues I have had are always based around that HDMI interface with a number of different fixes such as correct HDMI cable or other connection issues requiring resets from the supply device. I can appreciate their repair guys frustration as this industry standard seems to have many holes in it either that or the various manufactures are adhering to their own proprietary standards which causes glitches.
 
Posts
2,378
Likes
3,105
Any issues I have had are always based around that HDMI interface with a number of different fixes such as correct HDMI cable or other connection issues requiring resets from the supply device. I can appreciate their repair guys frustration as this industry standard seems to have many holes in it either that or the various manufactures are adhering to their own proprietary standards which causes glitches.
HDMI is such a garbage connector and the organization backing the standards is too. Massive rip-off. Really wish consumer devices had more robust connectors. Micro-HDMI is even worse, almost unusable due to being super fragile.
 
Posts
13,696
Likes
53,498
This is plenty enough to run 2 floor standing 3-way Tannoys for front R and L, plus a center channel, and two smaller Tannoy bookshelf speakers for the rears - subwoofer is powered. Plenty of volume for our use. This model is 100 WPC into 8 ohms, but they have more powerful models as well, up to 140 WPC.

If you have really inefficient speakers or a very large room it might not be enough, but I don't find it underpowered at all. At least not in the 3 days we have had it...
100 WPC should be plenty.
 
Posts
1,107
Likes
1,655
Is anyone here using a digital/streaming front end?

I picked up a ZEN Stream about a year ago. Using Qobuz for 24-bit streaming.

It sounds great and is mega convenient. Qobuz has an insanely wide selection from all genres. Highly recommend it.
 
Posts
2,446
Likes
7,040
HDMI is such a garbage connector and the organization backing the standards is too. Massive rip-off. Really wish consumer devices had more robust connectors. Micro-HDMI is even worse, almost unusable due to being super fragile.
C'mon Trev, tell us what you really think!
 
Posts
85
Likes
103
Is anyone here using a digital/streaming front end?

I picked up a ZEN Stream about a year ago. Using Qobuz for 24-bit streaming.

It sounds great and is mega convenient. Qobuz has an insanely wide selection from all genres. Highly recommend it.
I've been using a WIIM. I stream from my NAS that hosts my entire music collection (minus a few vinyl LPs that I haven't found time to rip yet).