Archer
··Omega Qualified WatchmakerTo clarify further, I always did allow for the possibility that it was correct. But even if it is right, it's still not the reference marketed to me.
But it is - as per your first post...
Omega 2501.81.00
That is exactly the reference you have purchased. That reference can contain either an 1120 or an 1109.
While I would own a 1109, they are certainly less desirable, looking at eBay, they take longer to sell, and is therefore worth a somewhat less than what I paid for it. At the end of the day, the dealer is responsible for accurate listings and not the buyer.
Please show us the listing. While I agree that the seller is responsible for accurately listing the watch, they aren't responsible for you going on a wild goose chase that came to completely wrong conclusions, such as this:
At this point, I start googling for all the dial color varieties and quickly realize that I have watch with a dial and hands swapped. That dial and that reference don't overlap at all, and I also have gotten a 1109, which is inferior in many ways to the 1120. So I don't have the watch I've ordered, and worse yet, it's got a dial from a completely different watch.
The bottom line is that you received a 25018100. The only thing that you didn't count on was that it was an older version with an 1109, instead of an 1120.