Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
Surely people in the legal profession never bill for their time unless there has been a written deliverable... 馃槜

Omega is not a law firm. They state their terms. You either agree with them or...
Call it a legal monopoly if you like.
gatorcpa
I have no issue with it, or their policy. I was adding to your response to the comment (supporting it).
Better analogy, but still flawed. Omega is the sole provider of the service that people are seeking, so in your analogy the watchmaker who charges for the estimate would be the only watchmaker on the planet. If you want your watch fixed, you really have no choice but to risk the initial inspection fee.
By the way, despite my having an issue with the analogy, I don't have an issue with what Omega is doing. There is labour involved, and people who say "it's just looking something up in a database, so how long could that possibly take" aren't really thinking it through. It's not just one guy sitting at a terminal that is involved here. Any purchase or order generates paperwork in the system, collecting of money, accounting, payment of taxes, and all the other things that go into running a business besides the actual work itself. My guess is that even with a no result returned, Omega is not likely making a lot of money on these, if any at all. To know if they were actually making money on the whole, you would have to know a lot more than we do, starting with how many get a good result, or no result at all, plus the costs associated every aspect of it.
Cheers, Al
i understand this, but I still believe that if the customer paid they should get an extract for the movement serial number supplied, stating what case the movement should be in and where and when it was delivered for sale.
i understand this, but I still believe that if the customer paid they should get an extract for the movement serial number supplied, stating what case the movement should be in and where and when it was delivered for sale.
i understand this, but I still believe that if the customer paid they should get an extract for the movement serial number supplied, stating what case the movement should be in and where and when it was delivered for sale.
Perhaps I've missed it in the thread somewhere, but what is your serial no (or first few digits).
That dial certainly doesn't match the case back, so this coupled withOmega rejecting your extract does unfortunately suggest you have a franken, or at the very least some replaced parts.
When exactly did they change the refund terms? I applied for this over 2mo ago.... in which case it could be that the no refund terms didn't exist then...
Right - and since in this case it didn't even get to the CEO then why the same cost?
Yes they charged me when I submitted the request back in August.
I think it is seriously time to get over it and move on.
Right - and since in this case it didn't even get to the CEO then why the same cost?
I have, but this forum thread hasn't! It's not even really about the money - I'm just disappointed at the poor level of customer service / bedside manner and expected more from a company that has such a high brand value.
I have, but this forum thread hasn't! It's not even really about the money - I'm just disappointed at the poor level of customer service / bedside manner and expected more from a company that has such a high brand value.
you sound like a 5 year old who doesn't get a snack right before dinner.
so blaming omega for your stupid move to buy this watch is a sing of manner ?
get grown