Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
if a service dial was put on a watch by Omega Bienne or at an AD service centre (for example, Omega Toronto SC), does that make it fail the EOA test?
I can encourage you to make a trip to our beautiful Switzerland, book an appointment at the Archives and ask them to show you what kind of work do they have to go through for some watches in order to fetch the information from old books.
That's a kind of an old-school multi-table SQL query they run manually and sometimes it takes much more than twenty minutes to provide with a satisfying outcome.
The average salary in Switzerland doesn't help to get the process cheaper. Wait, they could outsource the whole thing to Pakistan (!) 😀
for sure not !
Your problem is not the dial.
Your problem is that the pictures of your watch don’t correspond to what Omega would have expected to see, based on the serial you provided.
It's not my watch. I'm not even really referring to the OP's watch - just wondering how they would treat the scenario now that you have to send in pics.
Nothing would happen if the service part is a correct service part.
Now imagine you cross a border control in your Audi A3 with a chassis number referenced to be a VW Golf. The customs agent will not care of your aftermarket wheels - he still will be very curious about the situation and won’t let you go through.
If you show something that looks like what Omega expects to see, they will issue an EoA. If you show something totally different, they will reject your request. Labour done, they charge for it. Period.
Better analogy, but still flawed.
Correct, because it's an extrract of the archives, nothing more. By definition it can't be anything related to authenticity (beyond knowing if the serial number matches the type of watch that left the factory) or ownership once sold. The archives simply are not for that purpose, so calling that out as a "negative" is certainly not "fair" if that's what we are basing things on...
You made no mention of Longines, so if that was your object, it was certainly unclear.
You have a watch that needs service. You take it to a watchmaker that advertises a “free estimate”...
...That watchmaker looks at the watch, and tells you that he cannot fix it because parts are no longer available. I’ve just described Longines Extract of Archives process.
Please, where did I call that out as a "negative"?
My issue is that in the OP's case they DID check authenticity in order to penalize him.
And the other issue is that the penalty is self-evidently higher than their actual costs since they don't have to issue and send out an EOA.
Firstly Being British I have no idea who the second chap is, and assuming he is a baldy, I don't get the parallel to be honest. If both go into a hairdresser, both get a service, one doesn't get told to sod off but to pay for the privilege of them telling him so. A better parallel there would be with a $300 Geneve and a $50K Racing Speedy, both get can get an EOA and both pay the same price but it makes more sense for one than the other. It is the full price charge for no result and no extract which rankles. The hairdresser doesn't say, 'not today Joe, that'll be $20 please'.
Okay, so to use your words a "ridiculously over-emphasized disclaimer that the extract has absolutely nothing to do with authenticity and/or ownership" is what then, a positive? Or is it neutral? If it's positive or neutral, why did you even bring it up? Based on what you wrote, it sure seems like it was a negative...
I suppose that's one way to look at ti. For me, it's just performing the steps that any EOA should follow. Are you suggesting they should not check to see that the watch matches what the extract says it does?
That may be your feelings, but it's not fact. You have no way of knowing what the costs are for this process.
It follows, that if they decline to reimburse the customer for saved expenses in those instances in which they consider themselves exempted from providing the full service, they are penalizing him.
Can you tell me what service Omega is not providing? They spent the time to look up the information.
That was intended as a statement of fact and I did not express any opinion, one way or the other, on whether I consider the contents of the disclaimer to be sensible, justified, desirable, or not.
From a legal point of view it has to be presumed that the amount Omega charge for their EOA is (at least) equivalent to the service they provide.