Emeister
路Have I made an expensive mistake?
This popped up on my eBay homepage at lunchtime and after doing the few SM300 checks that I know I hit BIN and made immediate payment.
Can't believe that I didn't spot the '300' being printed below 'Seamaster' on the dial 馃槨
Am I correct in assuming this is a redial (or worse).
Realised the dial pictures were blurry or out of focus but was concentrating more on the 'open' 6 and 9.
The more I look at it now I'm not sure I like any of the printing, but I put it down to a scratched crystal earlier.
What looked like a 1506 bracelet (admittedly needing work) with two No. 16 end-links tipped me over the edge to buy.
Looks like it is only the top of the 1506 clasp and the folding parts behind have come from somewhere non-Omega.
Today's listing
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Omega-Seamaster-300m-Ref-165-024-/271923286981?ssPageName=STRK:MEBIDX:IT&_trksid=p2047675.l2557&nma=true&si=F31pagOdItnDv8xduWS4Z56MkQk%3D&orig_cvip=true&rt=nc
Earlier (withdrawn) listing - with some different photos
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Omega-Seamaster-300m-Ref-165-024-/271921442853?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item3f4fc7f025&nma=true&si=F31pagOdItnDv8xduWS4Z56MkQk%3D&orig_cvip=true&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2557
May 2015 listing from another seller. Feedbacks look to match up.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Omega-Seamaster-300-Vintage-Automatic-/171781546092?nma=true&si=F31pagOdItnDv8xduWS4Z56MkQk%3D&orig_cvip=true&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2557
Some of the photos and most of the listing text have been reused.
What are your opinions?
I was hoping it would clean up to be a wearable (not spectacular) vintage example to replace my current SM300 which has modern replacement dial and hands.
This popped up on my eBay homepage at lunchtime and after doing the few SM300 checks that I know I hit BIN and made immediate payment.
Can't believe that I didn't spot the '300' being printed below 'Seamaster' on the dial 馃槨
Am I correct in assuming this is a redial (or worse).
Realised the dial pictures were blurry or out of focus but was concentrating more on the 'open' 6 and 9.
The more I look at it now I'm not sure I like any of the printing, but I put it down to a scratched crystal earlier.
What looked like a 1506 bracelet (admittedly needing work) with two No. 16 end-links tipped me over the edge to buy.
Looks like it is only the top of the 1506 clasp and the folding parts behind have come from somewhere non-Omega.
Today's listing
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Omega-Seamaster-300m-Ref-165-024-/271923286981?ssPageName=STRK:MEBIDX:IT&_trksid=p2047675.l2557&nma=true&si=F31pagOdItnDv8xduWS4Z56MkQk%3D&orig_cvip=true&rt=nc
Earlier (withdrawn) listing - with some different photos
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Omega-Seamaster-300m-Ref-165-024-/271921442853?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item3f4fc7f025&nma=true&si=F31pagOdItnDv8xduWS4Z56MkQk%3D&orig_cvip=true&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2557
May 2015 listing from another seller. Feedbacks look to match up.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Omega-Seamaster-300-Vintage-Automatic-/171781546092?nma=true&si=F31pagOdItnDv8xduWS4Z56MkQk%3D&orig_cvip=true&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2557
Some of the photos and most of the listing text have been reused.
What are your opinions?
I was hoping it would clean up to be a wearable (not spectacular) vintage example to replace my current SM300 which has modern replacement dial and hands.
This website may earn commission from Ebay sales.