ac106
·What else?
The fact that it’s an Ultraman.
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
What else?
But you can say that about anything. Red Subs, Meters First, DONs, Inverted Jenny, blue Snaggletooth....
All minutiae to normal people but dog whistles to collectors. You think the ultraman is dumb. We get it.
It’s not just because of the orange hand. It’s because it’s a documented Ultraman. If you put a real ultraman orange chrono on another watch it doesn’t magically become a $30000 watch without the correct reference, extract etc.
go back 10 years in the different forum and u will find all this nonsense bubble talk ...... and what happened ... nothing .... end of the story
10 years ago, financial advisors and assets managers at banks, were not treating watches as an asset class.
yes but people complaint already that a paul newman is 15k , so whats your point. as long u r not in the market for one, who cares
The thing about these watches is that judging by the serial numbers there could be approximately 3000 of these 'Ultramans' out there. How many have had the hands reverted to standard over the years is unknowable, but potentially many may start to come to light as the value is established. I don't think anyone sane would pay more than £25k for a good one?
The thing about these watches is that judging by the serial numbers there could be approximately 3000 of these 'Ultramans' out there. How many have had the hands reverted to standard over the years is unknowable, but potentially many may start to come to light as the value is established. I don't think anyone sane would pay more than £25k for a good one?
yes but people complaint already that a paul newman is 15k , so whats your point. as long u r not in the market for one, who cares
I didn't read the Fratello article, but I can count serial numbers. How many got the orange hands is pure guesswork, so up to 3000 would be a reasonable estimate, and even Omega at this stage, more than 50 years later is guessing at numbers.
10 years ago, financial advisors and assets managers at banks, were not treating watches as an asset class.
You goons getting your knickers in a twist because your watches are “valuable”, and the ones that aren’t quite the same as yours “not valuable” is hilarious.
You should see how dumb you look, sniping and complaining.
I assume you are talking about FA/AM investing their own money in watches, not their clients? Obviously they can't invest their clients money as the vintage watch market isn't regulated by the FCA. So it's bankers that are pushing up the price of watches?
I wonder why it has to be guesswork for them. They have the archives. Why not just give a summer intern a "project" and have them look at every serial in the range? 😁
Well done for completely ignoring what I wrote.
My point is that the market now, is not the market 10 years ago.
Prices are not being driven just by collectors who are interested in watches because they are watches, but by people who are interested in watches as they believe they have a value which will appreciate.
These people could be buying gold, pork futures, or unicorn horns - the asset itself doesn’t matter, the value and it increasing does.
You goons getting your knickers in a twist because your watches are “valuable”, and the ones that aren’t quite the same as yours “not valuable” is hilarious.
You should see how dumb you look, sniping and complaining.