Tjmmartin
路is that a fake?? 馃榾
Very nice!
Very nice!
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
Good thing I've been stripping DON since last year 馃榾
Does "stripping DON" mean taking the bezel off of an older Speedmaster? 馃
I believe there are prior posts on this subject and the general consensus is that switching a bezel to restore your older, more valuable watch, is OK.
I'll have to look up those old threads. While I don't disagree, I would point out that in my short time here I have noticed the (relatively minor) critiques that parts don't quite look the same age so could have been replaced. So must the hypothetical -69 bezel on the -4 be disclosed? Or is close enough OK if an authentic part? Surely calling the watch "all original" would not be accurate.
Cheers
To strip the bezels for sale would be unfortunate. To remove them from a 145.022-69 and transfer them to your, 2998-4, assuming the 2998-4 lacks them, IMHO is not wrong.
Firstly, the older watch no doubt lost the original bezel during an Omega Service back when vintage didn't exist. Today, every owner wishes they still had their original watch parts. Omega did not return them.
The 145.022-69 is a transitional reference which had DON bezels and later versions as well. This reference is correct with either bezel.
I believe there are prior posts on this subject and the general consensus is that switching a bezel to restore your older, more valuable watch, is OK.