Does Anyone Know How Many Straight Writing Speedmasters Were Produced?

Posts
5,116
Likes
17,786
Coming up for auction at Dr. Crott another early one with Movm. No. 29600924, Ref. 145.022-69, Cal. 861, and it says ; origin Swiss but since there is no EoA i dont know if that means made in Swiss or sold in Swiss. Lots of aging on the hands and bezel - the caseback looks a whole lot better.... Is the writer of MWO book present here as we now have at least two posted outside of the 31xxxx range ?



Besides the serial number, two other features raise questions. This has a DON, which the SW A-11 didn't have. Also, the case is really chewed up from a hard life. As you noted, the caseback doesn't match the condition of the case. (That sunburst is wierd too.) Without an extract stating that this was sold in Japan, I would not believe it to be originally a SW A-11. Even with the proof of coming from Japan, it's very suspect, IMO.
 
Posts
976
Likes
1,878
Besides the serial number, two other features raise questions. This has a DON, which the SW A-11 didn't have. Also, the case is really chewed up from a hard life. As you noted, the caseback doesn't match the condition of the case. (That sunburst is wierd too.) Without an extract stating that this was sold in Japan, I would not believe it to be originally a SW A-11. Even with the proof of coming from Japan, it's very suspect, IMO.

Very suspicious indeed, and not something you usualy find in a Dr. Crott auction.
 
Posts
1,827
Likes
3,690
Hi Forum Friends!

Here is a 145.022-69 SW that I followed on an auction.
I didn't do any biding on it since the dial had a huge defect...(you can see it on the last picture).
But here is some info and pictures!

Serial nr 32192190.
No owner history.

 
Posts
201
Likes
365
Did anyone happen to compile these datapoints for the SW & Apollo XI into a table?
 
Posts
276
Likes
253
My is
What an excellent question! One of Omega's most distinctive historical features is the Straight Writing Speedmasters. While specific production numbers can be tough to pin down, it’s obvious that they’re highly rare and sought-after by collectors. I hope that additional details regarding their small production run comes available.
3 milion from 18.NOV 1970
Mr Fofii had allso booked in Magister book same 30xxxxx
Straight Writing SPM
Later Omega Extract
Edited:
 
Posts
1,827
Likes
3,690
Ok!!! my mistake. Let's update. And reorganize the list (chronological appearing in this thread). At the end, the ones without serial.

145.022-69 SW ApolloXI seen on OF:

#1: 31313986 - March 8, 1971 (EoA) - Japan
source @pdxleaf : https://omegaforums.net/threads/doe...eedmasters-were-produced.166302/#post-2267557)

#2: 31006193 - ? ?
same source as #1

#3 : 31328143 - May 19, 1971 (EoA) - Japan
source @befobe : https://omegaforums.net/threads/doe...eedmasters-were-produced.166302/#post-2275319

#4: 31619XXX - July 2, 1971 (EoA?) - Japan
source @n-theory : https://omegaforums.net/threads/doe...ters-were-produced.166302/page-2#post-2282420

#5: 31006222 - ? - ?
source @OneTwo : https://omegaforums.net/threads/doe...ters-were-produced.166302/page-3#post-2296651

#6: 31313536 - March 10, 1971 (EoA) - Japan
source @pdxleaf : https://omegaforums.net/threads/doe...ters-were-produced.166302/page-4#post-2297470

#7: 31622096 - ? - ?
source @pdxleaf : https://omegaforums.net/threads/doe...ters-were-produced.166302/page-4#post-2297471

#8: 31317410 - March 1971 (EoA?) - Japan
source @Ron_W : https://omegaforums.net/threads/doe...ters-were-produced.166302/page-4#post-2297479

#9: 31637332 - July 1, 1971 (EoA) - Japan
source @abrod520 : https://omegaforums.net/threads/ome...raight-writing-apollo-xi.110430/#post-1517971

#10: 316????? - July 1971 (EoA?) - Japan (?)
source @queriver : https://omegaforums.net/threads/straight-writing-eye-candy.111341/#post-1469490

#11: 31622878 - July 1, 1971 - (EoA) Japan
source @pdxleaf : https://omegaforums.net/threads/doe...ters-were-produced.166302/page-4#post-2302889

#12: 2960???? - July 2 , 1972 (Warranty-sell date) - Japan
source @Ron_W : https://omegaforums.net/threads/doe...ters-were-produced.166302/page-4#post-2325777
* particularity : has a DON ! *

#13: 31?????? - July 2 , 1971 (EoA) - Japan
source @pdxleaf : https://omegaforums.net/threads/doe...ters-were-produced.166302/page-4#post-2325836

#14. 31313984 - August 3, 1971 (EoA) - Japan
source @amphib44 : https://omegaforums.net/threads/doe...ters-were-produced.166302/page-4#post-2328094

*************************************************************************
#10, #13 could be doubles, but pics seem let think they are not
*************************************************************************

#?? : no serial, only 1 pic of the back - ? - ?
source @ortope : https://omegaforums.net/threads/doe...eedmasters-were-produced.166302/#post-2268079

I have been reading this post a few times, and it has been very helpful during my hunt...

But a question - are there any confirmed SW (both FG and Apollo) Speedys with serial numbers after 32 mil?
I have found a few, and a recent one that I am looking at has 3219xxxx.
 
Posts
1,458
Likes
8,965
I have been reading this post a few times, and it has been very helpful during my hunt...

But a question - are there any confirmed SW (both FG and Apollo) Speedys with serial numbers after 32 mil?
I have found a few, and a recent one that I am looking at has 3219xxxx.
Your recent one: SW or SW Apollo11?
 
Posts
165
Likes
348
Sorry... @befobe !
SW, but I think there is something weird with this one....??

Perhaps an engraving that was ground off? That + the over-polishing = not an attractive example.
 
Posts
976
Likes
1,878
Sorry... @befobe !
SW, but I think there is something weird with this one....??

Radial brushing pattern on the side wall ? Strange feature but the text seems very worn. I believe the SW FQ has been seen in that high range as it is more common than A11.
 
Posts
1,827
Likes
3,690
Radial brushing pattern on the side wall ? Strange feature but the text seems very worn. I believe the SW FQ has been seen in that high range as it is more common than A11.
The watch has been worked over, so a No Go for me, but the question regarding the high serial nr?
Anybody??
😬
 
Posts
976
Likes
1,878
The watch has been worked over, so a No Go for me, but the question regarding the high serial nr?
Anybody??
😬
I have not seen an EoA of one, but your example is now the 3rd i see this year with a 3219xxx SW FQ caseback. There is one from a French seller Atelier Jb Louise on C24 at the moment.

edit ; And a lucky hit also on C24 from the UK , so 32.201.623 confirmed ;

 
Posts
1,827
Likes
3,690
I have not seen an EoA of one, but your example is now the 3rd i see this year with a 3219xxx SW FQ caseback. There is one from a French seller Atelier Jb Louise on C24 at the moment.

edit ; And a lucky hit also on C24 from the UK , so 32.201.623 confirmed ;

Nice work!
I am looking at another one with the serial nr 32830082 (really late...), so it could be that there are late ones out there??
 
Posts
976
Likes
1,878
Nice work!
I am looking at another one with the serial nr 32830082 (really late...), so it could be that there are late ones out there??
June 1973 fits in the range mentioned in MWO book, so yes possible.
 
Posts
5,116
Likes
17,786
Nice work! Plo
I am looking at another one with the serial nr 32830082 (really late...), so it could be that there are late ones out there??
32830082 is about June, 1973.

Looking at the SW FQ (flight qualified) casebacks, it appears they have movement numbers from 31.000.844 to 32.857.xxx, making them first appear around January, 1971. They had a long run, with some reportedly sold as late as Oct. 1974. So yours fits in ones with later dates.

We know there appears overlap between the SWA11, SWFQ, No NASA medallion and NASAFQ. The later years of SWFQ are easier for me to explain. When there is a transition in design, the prior production parts aren't as in demand but a company still wants to sell what's already made. So casebacks with later movement numbers could show up.

Its more difficult for me when a SWFQ has an early movement number that preceeds the earliest known SWA11, as my theory says the SWA11 came first. For example, the auction above has early SWA11 with Movm. No. 29600924.
This one has problems. The 'XI' font is different than typical SWA11 casebacks. Most SWA11 fonts follow the earliest casebacks from the BA gold ones. This 29600924 follows later BA. Personally, I don't think this 29600924 was originally delivered as a SWFQ.

There is another early SWFQ numbered 30.992.XXX, which I suggested was an earlier production movement that sat in a bin when a later production watch was put together. The sales date was 1971 for that one with a production date of Oct, 1970.

That’s a little tangent.

So later production SWFQ do show up.
 
Posts
1,827
Likes
3,690
32830082 is about June, 1973.

Looking at the SW FQ (flight qualified) casebacks, it appears they have movement numbers from 31.000.844 to 32.857.xxx, making them first appear around January, 1971. They had a long run, with some reportedly sold as late as Oct. 1974. So yours fits in ones with later dates.

We know there appears overlap between the SWA11, SWFQ, No NASA medallion and NASAFQ. The later years of SWFQ are easier for me to explain. When there is a transition in design, the prior production parts aren't as in demand but a company still wants to sell what's already made. So casebacks with later movement numbers could show up.

Its more difficult for me when a SWFQ has an early movement number that preceeds the earliest known SWA11, as my theory says the SWA11 came first. For example, the auction above has early SWA11 with Movm. No. 29600924.
This one has problems. The 'XI' font is different than typical SWA11 casebacks. Most SWA11 fonts follow the earliest casebacks from the BA gold ones. This 29600924 follows later BA. Personally, I don't think this 29600924 was originally delivered as a SWFQ.

There is another early SWFQ numbered 30.992.XXX, which I suggested was an earlier production movement that sat in a bin when a later production watch was put together. The sales date was 1971 for that one with a production date of Oct, 1970.

That’s a little tangent.

So later production SWFQ do show up.
Thanks mate, I always learn something new here on the Forum!