Note that MWO indicates that delivery of the "standard" SW version has been postponed due to NASA approval delay ; so we could think the "Apollo 11" version has been delivered "before" the first SW versions, due to the fact that there isn't the name "NASA" on it...
I have thought a lot about this statement. The 145.022-69 caseback varieties have confused me. I expected an evolution in design, with changes connected to previous versions, but instead it seemed Omega was jumping back and forth in their design.
There are two primary data sets that help determine the timeline for when a Speedmaster was developed: one is the movement serial number and the other is the production date. These can be problematic for several reasons. The movements are made separately from the watches and the manufacturer can grab whatever is available; they are not added to a watch in numerical order. Some of the movements numbers may just be incorrect, as they may not have actually left the factory in that watch. As for production dates, watches are known to sit on shelves long after they have been produced. These two data sets are informative, but can lead to inaccurate conclusions.
What I realized recently is that I have been ignoring another data set, which is the design of the watches themselves. Looking the design elements alone, I think I finally have made sense of these and think I understand when they were produced.
Here's a chart for what I believe is the timeline:
Starting with the 145.022-68, it is the first 861 caliber in a Speedy. It includes the DON bezel, AML, 1116 bracelet and pre-moon caseback.
Coming soon after that is the 145.022-69 with 861, DON that soon changes to DNN, painted Omega logo, 1116 bracelet available, and pre-moon caseback.
We know that on Nov. 25th, 1969, Omega presented gold speedmasters to the Apollo astronauts. These gold watches led to the development of the BA 145.022-69 for sale to the public. These watches had DON bezels, AML, and 1116 bracelets. Some had crater moon boxes.
These gold speedmasters were the first time we saw the SW casebacks with the Apollo XI. What's more there were three variants, with the first one a thin font and the other two with fatter fonts. The first variant is an identical match to the same thin font on the steel SW Apollo XI that came later.
To present the gold speedys on Nov 25, 1969, Omega obviously had to begin designing much earlier. The question is whether they began the design using the 145.022-68 or the 145.022-69 pre-moon. It could be either, but I think the 145.022-68 is likely as it has the AML, which made it into the BA 145.022-69, as well as the DON and 1116 bracelet. Still, there's valid reasons for why they could have based it off the dash 69.
Here's where it gets less clear. I think the steel SW A-XI came next. The World's Fair EXPO 70 took place in Japan on Mar 15, 1970 and the Apollo 12 astronauts visited EXPO 70 on Mar 25th, 1970. The EXPO had a moon rock that was seen by 14 million visitors. This EXPO added to the space and moon craze. It is believed that the Japanese distributor for Omega ordered the SW Apollo XI watches. The 145.022-69 pre-moon casebacks were the normal steel Speedmaster that was then commonly available. It makes sense that after the EXPO 70, the distributor would order special editions using the BA 145.022-69 caseback design. It's thought that the movements used in the SW A-11 watches are between 31.000.xxx and 31.310.xxx, putting them around March 1971 to May 1971. The timeline fits. What's more , there was a printed moon box that came with these SW A-11 watches, which was similar to the crater moon boxes that came with the gold speedmasters.
The 145.022-69 pre-moon caseback was sold through about Sept. 1971, based on what people have reported. Looking at the SW FQ (flight qualified) casebacks, it appears they have movement numbers from 31.62xx.xxx to 32.857.xxx, making them first appear around June, 1971. They had a long run, with some reportedly sold as late as Oct. 1974. It makes sense that the Omega designers would be thinking about a longer lasted caseback inscription, as the SW A-11 had the Apollo XI on it. By now, there had been other Apollo missions and they did not want to be limited to only 1969. So they developed the flight qualified by NASA language and started selling these world wide.
Around Oct 1971, the first medallion no NASA casebacks appeared, based on the movement numbers. These seem to have only been available two months. It's been said that these new medallion casebacks did not have inscriptions on them because NASA may have not approved of the text that was on the SW FQ.
Right after this came the 145.022-71 medallion flight qualified casebacks. These are a natural design progression. There is a problematic element, which is that some 145.022-71s supposedly have movements that came from as early as April, 1971. I think this can be explained by the watchmaker grabbing an older movement that had been not yet used.
This all may have been obvious to everyone and I am only now figuring it out. Even so, it now makes sense to me and Omega wasn't haphazardly producing casebacks for the 145.022-69.
If you made it all the way through this post, congrats. Comments and constructive criticism is encouraged.
Happy almost New Year's to everyone.