Do my new watch pass or fail inspection?

Posts
513
Likes
4,962
My best advice, like we give to all new comers to this forum & hobby, is read as much as you can about vintage watches.
This is a good place to start.
https://omegaforums.net/threads/learn-how-to-fish.52603/

All the threads that come up here on “is this original”, are valuable to see what experienced members point out as merits or flaws. After a while you learn the signs and can apply those skills to your own hunting.
If you are on a budget, pop over to the bargain thread and check out what gets posted there daily (some days are more active than others).
https://omegaforums.net/threads/rec...-deals-on-ebay-other-auctions.113139/page-149

Not only will you see some nice watches on the cheap from the full spectrum of horology, but there is usually discussion or commentary on them so we all learn and share- kind of a group critique.
@Freddedw those are really good advices coming from @JwRosenthal and although still being a noob myself I totally agree!
 
Posts
513
Likes
4,962
It worked out fine for you!
Go on hunting, thats the fun part.....and, do yourself a favour, post before you pull the trigger!

PS: Nivada, Yema, Wittnauer, Wyler Vetta, Lanco, Lip, Enicar, Cyma, Armand Nicolet.....a lot of tasty fish in the sea.
I would add Eterna to the list - some great pre ETA movements in very reasonable price range with a lot off great dial variances. Already mentioned Tissot plus Certina, Zenith, Zodiac and possibly Seiko, if you will not mind Japanese movement.
 
Posts
1,175
Likes
2,459
Yes it has the features i want now I just have to decide if its the correct mix for me or not.
That one is definitely different from the previous watches you posted about too. I think the price is very good. Gotta think about if you want a bumper though.
 
Posts
5,636
Likes
5,800
That one is definitely different from the previous watches you posted about too. I think the price is very good. Gotta think about if you want a bumper though.
and this is an important consideration. The specifications for a bumper movement is pretty loose compared to, say, a 565. Plus the bumper has had more years to wear out.
 
Posts
69
Likes
80
That one is definitely different from the previous watches you posted about too. I think the price is very good. Gotta think about if you want a bumper though.
is the bumper cal. no good? if it goes wrong 1 minut a month or 3 isnt really a deal braker for me if its the accuracy we are talking about.
 
Posts
5,636
Likes
5,800
is the bumper cal. no good? if it goes wrong 1 minut a month or 3 isnt really a deal braker for me if its the accuracy we are talking about.
As I recall it only winds in one direction and the caliber isn't as refined as some later ones.

The 330 through 355 movements can vary from 0 to +40 in three positions and be acceptable, with a maximum difference from fastest to slowest of those three being 30 seconds.

The 550 through 565 movements can vary from 0 to +20 in three positions and be acceptable, with a maxiumum difference from fastest to slowest of those three being 15 seconds.

So as you see, Omega expected better timekeeping out of the newer movements. There are a cubic crapton of factors why this could be, and I am not a watchmaker, so I can't tell you what those are. Only that the newer the movement, the more refined it is new from the factory. It is possible that either series of movements might beat these specs like a rented mule, but they are not required to. Also a nearly-new bumper might well outperform a freshly-serviced but worn out rotor movement.

So you have to take use case into consideration. Will you wear this watch once in a while for a day or two? Or will it be your daily watch?

One minute a month is two seconds per day. Neither of the series we're talking about is necessarily capable of that sort of timekeeping. Five to fifteen seconds a day on the wrist might be all you can expect.
 
Posts
69
Likes
80
As I recall it only winds in one direction and the caliber isn't as refined as some later ones.

The 330 through 355 movements can vary from 0 to +40 in three positions and be acceptable, with a maximum difference from fastest to slowest of those three being 30 seconds.

The 550 through 565 movements can vary from 0 to +20 in three positions and be acceptable, with a maxiumum difference from fastest to slowest of those three being 15 seconds.

So as you see, Omega expected better timekeeping out of the newer movements. There are a cubic crapton of factors why this could be, and I am no a watchmaker, so I can't tell you what those are. Only that the newer the movement, the more refined it is new from the factory. It is possible that either series of movements might beat these specs like a rented mule, but they are not required to. Also a nearly-new bumper might well outperform a freshly-serviced but worn out rotor movement.

So you have to take use case into consideration. Will you wear this watch once in a while for a day or two? Or will it be your daily watch?

One minute a month is two seconds per day. Neither of the series we're talking about is necessarily capable of that sort of timekeeping. Five to fifteen seconds a day on the wrist might be all you can expect.
My idea is daily, but my phone and computer will alarm every time im going to miss something so my demand of the watch ability of time keeping is rather wide;-) as long it runs when its supposed to and doesnt miss by minutes a day im fine.
 
Posts
292
Likes
986
If you are considering other brands, maybe take a look at Smiths, made in England up until about 1971. I have had a few and found them to be very well made and robust. If they were good enough for the British army.....
Mine are all pre 1960 but they made some lovely centre second hand Deluxe models in the mid to late 60s. Prices are creeping up, particularly the military ones, but they are still very affordable.
Cheers.