Cons of Buying a Watch-Co Built Omega

Posts
1,024
Likes
3,998
So how would collectors view sourcing a pristine DON bezel to put on a Pre-moon Speedy with a busted up DON bezel?

It's not original to that particular watch but I doubt anyone would view that as anything but adding value to the piece, and certainly not as a Franken.
 
Posts
6,832
Likes
13,797
Actually yes, some may note that the bezel is not original to the watch Some may see it as a franken, but then again despite some here insisting a franken is not always seen as an untouchable watch or a bad watch, but value has to be at par with modifications.

But AGAIN, none of this applies to watchco, they don't modify watches, they make watches from spare parts. Who's different ball game.

As I said before, the problem is many actually don't know this before buying watchco watches.

And I am not saying they are bad. They are what they are for good and bad.
 
Posts
6,832
Likes
13,797
There is a clarification. One thing is what a collector or hobbyist may have on a watch in terms of wear, be it a strap, bracelet or bezel or even hands, the other is what it is sold as or with, which is why most people that modify their watch for personal use keep the original parts in case they want to sell it.
 
Posts
8,258
Likes
19,449
I just replaced the thermostat that was originally installed in my house. Oh Lord...how do I tell my wife we now life in a Franken house? 😜
 
Posts
1,024
Likes
3,998
But AGAIN, none of this applies to watchco, they don't modify watches, they make watches from spare parts.

Which is exactly what Omega does really. The only difference is the assembler and a few decades.
 
Posts
693
Likes
705
Which is exactly what Omega does really. The only difference is the assembler and a few decades.
I'd call that subcontracting. Just wish they kept better records.
 
Posts
29,679
Likes
76,840
But AGAIN, none of this applies to watchco, they don't modify watches, they make watches from spare parts.

They do modify watches...unless you buy into the idea that they are using all NOS movements that have never been in a watch - I for one don't buy that but YMMV. I know for a fact because I've serviced a number of Watchco watches that were just bought from them, and there was already wear on the parts inside, so they had clearly been used before they were modified to be a SM300.

If we are being accurate here, they are taking an existing watch, and changing the case, dial and hands, so they ARE modifying watches.
 
Posts
441
Likes
65
i like the word "modifed" as opposed to "original condition". i would like to find a quarts mvt. to fit into an accutron case. - vinn
 
Posts
6,832
Likes
13,797
Which is exactly what Omega does really. The only difference is the assembler and a few decades.
Yes, we established that already, any brand really does that, the difference is Omega assembles omega watches, but Watchco doesn't assemble watchco watches... They assemble watches from another brand and then impose a premium for that. Which is why I said they should stamp the dial with " omega by watchco" or something like that so Its clear that they are the assembly line and it's their watch, even if made from omega parts.

Omega may service watchco watches, but I'm sure these watches don't fall under Omega warranty.

They do modify watches...unless you buy into the idea that they are using all NOS movements that have never been in a watch - I for one don't buy that but YMMV. I know for a fact because I've serviced a number of Watchco watches that were just bought from them, and there was already wear on the parts inside, so they had clearly been used before they were modified to be a SM300.

If we are being accurate here, they are taking an existing watch, and changing the case, dial and hands, so they ARE modifying watches.

Not IMO. but I guess it's a matter of perspective. If I build a car from scratch and then take the engine from an older car and place it in my "build from spare parts homemade car" I am not modyfing the car that had the original engine, I'm just taking the engine out and placing it on my new build, similarly, if I get a NOS case from an sm300, then I add hands and dial from another source and lastly I grab the movement from a "cosmic" and put it in there I'm not modifying a Cosmic, I am building an SM300 with a Cosmic movement. Further on this point Watchco is not selling a "Omega Cosmic in NOS SM case". They are selling a "SM300". So they themselves do not perceive their watches as modified but new built.

As you said their internal parts are actually not NOS, which is the cherry on top as people like TOM and many others are really not aware that not only they are not getting a genuine Omega, but they are getting a watch made with bits and pieces old and new. Forums are plagued by comments and surprised reactions from people that did not actually know they're getting a Franken. Yes, perhaps it's their fault as Archer stated, but I would want more transparency from Watchco and less brand hijacking.

In no Omega Archive will you see this serial of a watchco listed. The parts will be replacement parts and the movement , if they could track it down, would belong to an entirely different watch.

So, what do you call a watch made from parts by a third party with a movement borrowed from an older watch and made to replicate a model from Omega. A watch that is not archived nor given any warranty by Omega. A watch that did not exist until that third party assembled it? I call if a Franken.

I don't call it a genuine Omega
I don't see the reason for the premium prices
I don't even see the point . Why not just create your own brand? Like Tudor, for example, even if it uses Rolex parts it was still and is still Tudor.

But of course watchco would not sell as many watches of they didn't hijack another brand or definitely not at those prices, so there is that.
Edited:
 
Posts
29,679
Likes
76,840
Omega may service watchco watches, but I'm sure these watches don't fall under Onega warranty.

Of course not, because Omega clearly didn't sell them. This would be like a grey market dealer providing their own warranty, or those places that customize watches giving their own warranty (Bamford and the like).

As you said their internal parts are actually not NOS, which is the cherry on top as people like TOM and many others are really not aware that not only they are not getting a genuine Onega, but they are getting a watch made with bits and pieces old and new.

In no Omega Archive will you see this serial of a watchco listed. The parts will be replacement parts and the movement , if they could track it down, would belong to an entirely different watch.

Again, no excuse for the shady tactics used by Watchco. But I doubt that very many who actually bought one of these truly don't understand what they are getting.

And yes, the serial number will be listed, and if Omega is involved they will actually modify the listing to reflect the new model of the watch. Again you can believe what you want, but you continue to ignore that this practice is allowed by Omega, and they will even do it themselves. I don't have direct experience myself with them doing one, but the CS policy clearly states that they will (I also have confirmation from Omega directly of this) and the records would be updated to reflect the modified watch model.

Cheers, Al
 
Posts
6,832
Likes
13,797
Do a search under Watchco and you will see many forums where people do not know what they're buying or what watchco is. Even in this thread Tom believed his movement was NOS.

And no, I don't ignore Omega knows about this or accepts it, but that doesn't change the point I'm trying to make regarding the Franken nature of the watches. Omega corporate policy doesn't really change the fact that it's a third party making watches from spare parts and then selling them at premium prices. Maybe Omega is happy with the exposure, maybe they like it, maybe they will change it....maybe not.

Anyway, to me they are not Genuine Factory Omega watches, and they should not be perceived as such.
 
Posts
29,679
Likes
76,840
And no, I don't ignore Omega knows about this or accepts it, but that doesn't change the point I'm trying to make regarding the Franken nature of the watches. Omega corporate policy doesn't really change the fact that it's a third party making watches from spare parts and then selling them at premium prices. Maybe Omega is happy with the exposure, maybe they like it, maybe they will change it....maybe not.

Anyway, to me they are not Genuine Factory Omega watches, and they should not be perceived as such.

So the fact that Omega would do this if you asked them, would that be a genuine Omega watch then?
 
Posts
6,832
Likes
13,797
So the fact that Omega would do this if you asked them, would that be a genuine Omega watch then?
Of course! It would be a custom built watch by Omega. I find it strange that if I called Omega and asked them to get my Cosmic movement and place it into a build NOS different model they would, but obviously you know better than me. All brands make custom changes of you pay for them

But I don't think it's that strange that if Omega made a watch and gave it to me it would be an Omega custom Built to specification while if someone other than Omega does it it would not.
 
Posts
29,679
Likes
76,840
So If an approved Omega servicer did the same thing, with Omega's blessing using new Omega parts (except the movement), would be it be a genuine Omega?
 
Posts
6,832
Likes
13,797
No when it's a different brand and the watches are sold under a different merchant name. I would accept it if they where "omega by watchco" but not as genuine Omega, and definitely not sold as new Omega.

There is no 2014 Omega seamaster line with the specs of the watchco sm300 anywhere in the O what website, or catalogue, or archives. And your exception ( except the movement) is a big, BIG exception.
 
Posts
29,679
Likes
76,840
No when it's a different brand and the watches are sold under a different merchant name. I would accept it if they where "omega by watchco" but not as genuine Omega, and definitely not sold as new Omega.

There is no 2014 Omega seamaster line with the specs of the watchco sm300 anywhere in the O what website, or catalogue, or archives. And your exception ( except the movement) is a big, BIG exception.

Not sure what you mean, and I think you misunderstood. All the parts would be genuine Omega, including the movement. But obviouisly the movement is not new, but all the other parts are.

Put it this way - if an approved Omega servicer did the exact same thing as Omega does, converting one watch to another, using all the same parts that Omega does, would it be a genuine Omega?
 
Posts
6,832
Likes
13,797
I would ask Omega, and I can tell you at least the NYC Boutique does not consider Watchco watches as genuine omegas, neither does any Omega Boutique sell watchco watches.

Ita a custom built watch, in this case they are mass produced custom built and the fact the use used parts makes them frankens IMO.

If Omega embraced them that much they would catalogue them, list them, and sell them at their boutiques.

But listen, you don't have to convince me, I just have an opinion. And you have yours. As you said before maybe a wrong opinion but I'm not going to change it really because it's quite clear to me what I would be buying and what I would not.

I don't have anything against custom watches, modified watches or Franken watches, I have a lot against deceptive marketing and profiteering.
 
Posts
29,679
Likes
76,840
I'll take that as a "no" then. And to be clear I am not bringing Watchco into this (I have no idea if they are an approved Omega servicer), and not talking about people selling completed watches, but doing what Omega does and that is to convert one watch to another. The reason Omega won't list these or sell them, is because they have no watch to sell. Again what I am referring to is someone sending their dad's old dress watch in to Omega that they will never wear because the style doesn't suit them, and having Omega convert it into something they would wear regularly.

So it seems that if Omega does the this it's fine, but someone does it (with full approval of Omega) it's not fine.

Have I got that right? I'm not trying to convince you of anything, this more for my own understanding, and a bit of "reductio ad absurdum" at the same time...