Don't worry If you can scan better pics, maybe I can do an excel table and a plain text file. Better for the search function.
Actually, as I've been at home for a while now... I started typing these up in .xlsx format - how do I upload for checks before continuing
Not sure if we can upload directly but a link to Google or Dropbox should be possible... If you like, DM me
This is fantastic! Of course Murphy's Law has struck and I don't seem to find the correct combination for Seamaster ref 165.001. Does anyone happen to know? Cheers Ian
I really love this scans! Used them many many times. And I love text search. It makes finding easy and quick. So I took the scans, twisted them a bit and run an OCR software over it. After fine-tuning the result and formatting it as PDF, I have now a nice set of four pages that I can go through with text search. Still need to find a place to post it for sharing. Any idea where to (permanently) place a PDF for downloading? Would like to share it here in OF! (If you use this charts, please cross-check with the original scans. There might be some mistakes .)
One of the most useful threads on this forum, saved me from investing in a few bucks on a bracelet that originally belonged to another model, thank you OP!
Since the thread is re-heated and questions are piling up, I'd like to add one for our pros, as well How can one figure out a bracelet's ref no if it's not written on the clasp? There is one I'd like to get for my 166.(0)020 so I'd expect to see 1037 on the clasp and 570 on end-links. No 570 does exist on end-links but only no 12 are the only digits on the clasp. Didn't check for the date digits, though. The bracelet looks like this: I'd like to use it for my SMDV which I'll also buy from the same seller. He says the bracelet is original to the watch but the evidence is mixed to my opinion, as mentioned above.
So, here something to share on OF. The initial scans of this thread transferred into a PDF: 201202_Case_Bracelet_End_Link_List.pdf (If you use this charts, please cross-check with the original scans. There might be some mistakes. ) (I really love these scans! Used them many many times. And I love text search. It makes finding easy and quick. So I took the scans, twisted them a bit and run an OCR software over it. After fine-tuning the result and formatting it as PDF, I have now a nice set of four pages that I can go through with text search.)
I have a crown size list and plexi interchangeably list too if you want me to add it here or maybe somewhere else?
Many thanks @michael e and @zoohannover for your efforts. It helped my find the right bracelet and end links for my 168.010 in no time.
Many thanks, i use the scan´s verry often and i thought about doing an excel sheet by myself, but never had the time ... ok i was too lazy
Very interesting list, but making some cross-check with Moonwatch Only book, for instance, if we take the Speedmaster ST 145.012, in the original list of the OP states that the bracelet is the 1171/633 and the book (page 310, 3rd edition 2019) stated that could be the bracelets 1039/516 or 1116/575. I'm wondering if the list above are "replacement" list when is needed to be serviced and no the original ones? If this is the case, should be clearly noticed Thoughts?
