Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
Agreed—the caseback engravings are inconsistent with every other example I’ve seen. That’s a huge red flag for me. Not saying it’s a clone for sure, but that alone would be enough to have me doubting authenticity. If it’s a clone it’s a good one from what I can see. …But I’d want to see all the bits we can’t currently see.
I’m also confused by the dealer mark on the warranty card. Is it a boutique or an AD?
Huh.... interesting! TBH, the whole dealer mark is really odd too... Don't they usually at least say their CITY in it? Not just "we promise we good, Pennsylvania"?
I think they can put anything they want there. I've had watches I've purchased from legit AD's and they leave it blank. With this being registered in 2025 all that really matters is that the watch was digitally registered with Omega at the time of sale.
I do agree that putting Authorized Dealer and Omega Boutique on the card is weird.
'Eseapement' and 'Co-Axel'?
I also agree this looks like a fake. One other item that I noted is the date on the warranty card. It is PRINTED onto a strip that is placed on the card. I have never seen that - only dates written in by pen. If anyone has seen this before, I would like to know - seems like a hassle for any AD to do this over using a pen.
It's absolutely not a clone.
It's a counterfeit.
Nice of the photographer to avoid showing the balance bridge.
And where are the shiny pivots in the jewels?