Brand New Speedmaster Professional Stopped after 9 to10 Hours on Full Wind.

Locked
Posts
58
Likes
17
This one is mine (on the left馃榿). I've worn it off and on since I bought it and it's never been babied. Serviced after 6 and 12 years (approx) by Omega in Eastleigh, England as I'm a Brit. I'm a watchmaker now so, no-one else touches it...

At 7:40, the hour hand is approaching the continuous running seconds counter on the left of the dial. If that hand is a little high, or more likely rising away from the pivot so it's not parallel to the dial, it will contact the hour hand and stop the watch. With no further details, I'd put a small bet that is the problem. Bet if you start it at 10:30, it will run until 7:40 again..

Cheers, Chris

Thanks. Could be the problem. How did you find the quality of the service from Eastleigh?
 
Posts
786
Likes
7,282
馃嵖.....interesting.....if it's brand new from an Omega AD or boutique....just take it back and get a new one.....


If not.....hmmmm......
























tenor.gif
 
Posts
2,219
Likes
4,947
Thanks. Could be the problem. How did you find the quality of the service from Eastleigh?
Variable... In fact, the Speedmaster was in there twice without issues but I also have a (from new) 1997 Constellation and it ran fine for the first 5 years until it went for a service there. They damaged the gold bezel (about 拢1500 to replace today) but replaced it the moment I swore loudly! It never ran correctly though and was never in COSC spec after that even though they serviced it two more times.... (I was youngish and foolish and didn't know any watchmakers).

To be honest, this was so long ago that my experience is irrelevant as I doubt they work in the same way today. If it's an Omega service centre then you shouldn't have any concerns about sending any fairly modern watch there, say an 1120 calibre and on. Vintage is your own choice but most people don't recommend it.

Are you in UK?

Cheers, Chris
 
Posts
58
Likes
17
Variable... In fact, the Speedmaster was in there twice without issues but I also have a (from new) 1997 Constellation and it ran fine for the first 5 years until it went for a service there. They damaged the gold bezel (about 拢1500 to replace today) but replaced it the moment I swore loudly! It never ran correctly though and was never in COSC spec after that even though they serviced it two more times.... (I was youngish and foolish and didn't know any watchmakers).

To be honest, this was so long ago that my experience is irrelevant as I doubt they work in the same way today. If it's an Omega service centre then you shouldn't have any concerns about sending any fairly modern watch there, say an 1120 calibre and on. Vintage is your own choice but most people don't recommend it.

Are you in UK?

Cheers, Chris
I see. Yes in UK. The reason I ask is I found Omega Service in UK to be terrible around 15 years ago. I had a collection of vintage Speedmasters and took 3 in to my local AD to be serviced/overhauled. The watches went to STS first and the standard was absolutely appalling. They couldn't have even checked the terrible work they did. Eastleigh then attempted to get them right but again not much better than STS. They had to go back to Switzerland a few times as well before they were eventually right but after that I sold them all. My brother sent in a Seamaster PO 43.5mm METAS version recently for regulation and came back with a scratched caseback. Not impressed.
Edited:
 
Posts
58
Likes
17
As you seem 100% positive that it's fully wound, just take it back and have them sort it. No watch company is perfect, even though they market themselves as such...

Cheers, Al
Thanks for your reply. So as far as you're aware there are no real problems with the 1861 movement and is it generally very reliable?
 
Posts
18,107
Likes
27,413
Thanks for your reply. So as far as you're aware there are no real problems with the 1861 movement and is it generally very reliable?
It's considered one of the most robust and reliable chronograph movements out there.
 
Posts
3,329
Likes
8,766
We're getting a little repetitive here.
 
Posts
3,329
Likes
8,766
The 1861 movement is very reliable, your watch most likely has a minor issue and the AD will replace it.
 
Posts
58
Likes
17
The 1861 movement is very reliable, your watch most likely has a minor issue and the AD will replace it.
OK. Thanks.
 
Posts
2,219
Likes
4,947
I see. Yes in UK. The reason I ask is I found Omega Service in UK to be terrible around 15 years ago. I had a collection of vintage Speedmasters and took 3 in to my local AD to be serviced/overhauled. The watches went to STS first and the standard was absolutely appalling. They couldn't have even checked the terrible work they did. Eastleigh then attempted to get them right but again not much better than STS. They had to go back to Switzerland a few times as well before they were eventually right but after that I sold them all. My brother sent in a Seamaster PO 43.5mm METAS version recently for regulation and came back with a scratched caseback. Not impressed.

Bad news and I'm surprised.

STS have a good reputation nowadays although I've never dealt with them. It's very hard for any collector to know the standard of work that's been done on the movement but, Simon Freese who was at STS is a well known Watchmaker with top qualifications so, it seems unlikely this happened during his time there. Obviously, case marking is easy to see and it seems unlikely that STS typically have a problem or everyone would complain.

It doesn't sound like Eastleigh have got much better but one or two problems, unfortunate as they are, will happen as no-one is perfect. It's all a bit worrying to be honest as you're not the only one who has said this.

I hope the Speedmaster works out.

Cheers, Chris
 
Posts
847
Likes
8,408
My FOIS stopped after 4hrs after wearing it new out of the box. Found out that the sub second hand was touching the dial. I had to send the watch in for warranty work for 3months.
At the end I got it serviced and working well at the moment. Time keeping isnt that great compare it to my Nomos.
 
Posts
58
Likes
17
Common? By what measure?
I mean that a number of people have encountered the same issue/problem.
 
Posts
891
Likes
2,997
I mean that a number of people have encountered the same issue/problem.

I do understand your frustration but a few mentions on OF of a particular issue versus the large quantity of Speedy Pros sold each year doesn't qualify as common in my mind. I guess we'll have to agree to disagree on the definition of common.
 
Posts
58
Likes
17
I do understand your frustration but a few mentions on OF of a particular issue versus the large quantity of Speedy Pros sold each year doesn't qualify as common in my mind. I guess we'll have to agree to disagree on the definition of common.
I would guess that if it's being mentioned on OF by a number of people would mean that it's happening many times more to people who don't use watch forums.
 
Posts
18,107
Likes
27,413
I would guess that if it's being mentioned on OF by a number of people would mean that it's happening many times more to people who don't use watch forums.
You realize that the members here most likely own over 10,000 Speedmasters right? It's not common by far.

At least 10 new ones with that movement are purchased a month and you have to go back 2 years?

Not common.
 
Posts
58
Likes
17
You realize that the members here most likely own over 10,000 Speedmasters right? It's not common by far.
Thank you. No, I didn't realise as many as that, but the people who have posted the problems are on new or quite new watches and I would guess that the number with NEW Speedmaster Professionals or Speedmasters with 1861 movement will be many times lower????
 
Posts
568
Likes
1,260
You've told everyone you have a problem with your Speedy Pro. Several people have responded saying yes, sounds like you do. Take it to your AD and get it sorted out. Yet, you continue to belabor the point. What else are you seeking?