Bought at auction: Constellation 167.005 18ct gold

Posts
19
Likes
16
So I bought this at an on-line house clearance auction. Sight unseen馃槃
Hope to collect this afternoon. Did some research in advance and it's 1960's 167.005 with 351 movement. Ot at least it should have.
From all the images I could find it looks correct, other than maybe the crown (should be 10 sided?).
The view appears to be to do the minimum. Get it serviced, new crystal, strap & minimal clean of case.

All thoughts welcome. And advice

 
Posts
862
Likes
1,602
So I bought this at an on-line house clearance auction. Sight unseen馃槃
Hope to collect this afternoon. Did some research in advance and it's 1960's 167.005 with 351 movement. Ot at least it should have.
From all the images I could find it looks correct, other than maybe the crown (should be 10 sided?).
The view appears to be to do the minimum. Get it serviced, new crystal, strap & minimal clean of case.

All thoughts welcome. And advice

So the 351 is a bumper automatic used in the late 1940鈥檚 and early 1950鈥檚. If this is a 1960鈥檚 piece being a chronometer, it should have a 551 movement. The case is over polished at the lugs especially. The dial is in poor condition with a possible redial but I鈥檒l let the experts in here validate that one.

It鈥檚 just not in great condition.
 
Posts
13,447
Likes
18,658
Should have a cal. 551 rotor automatic movement. Cal. 351 is a bumper automatic, which would never fit in a slim case like this one.

The case reference could be either 14900 or 167.005. They are the same watch. Omega just changed their internal numbering system around 1963. Scalloped crown could be original to the watch.

The watch case could either be 14K or 18K gold depending on where it was originally sold.

Hope this helps,
gatorcpa
 
Posts
19
Likes
16
Thanks for that feedback. Yes, for sure the case looks poor and the badly damaged crystal make it difficult to get a view of the dial. And while I believe it "runs", in that the images show a small time difference, there is no other information. So full of risks, and no returns option. But I set a strict limit on bidding, and as best I can see there is only upside. Not that that had anything to do with buying it.
 
Posts
91
Likes
135
I think your plan is sound: a service and minimal clean will help you see what you've got. Be interesting to get a good look at the dial once the crystal is swapped out or cleaned. You just might end up with a nice, wearable watch馃榾
 
Posts
34,915
Likes
39,479
That鈥檚 a pretty rough looking case for sure, hopefully the muck is all limited to the crystal and it鈥檚 a Cal 551 as mentioned above but even if the dial is clean and movement is correct, the case condition is rather hard to get past so you would want it to be very cheap indeed, slightly above melt value
 
Posts
6,481
Likes
10,011
The main problem is the bezel is missing
was just typing that!
 
Posts
34,915
Likes
39,479
The main problem is the bezel is missing
I was looking so hard at the lugs I didn鈥檛 even even look at the bezel, that鈥檚 definitely another problem, this is really a whole lot of problems for one watch
 
Posts
4,716
Likes
9,365
The main problem is the bezel is missing
Hi
just reading and thinking the same thing....
bill
 
Posts
19
Likes
16
That鈥檚 a pretty rough looking case for sure, hopefully the muck is all limited to the crystal and it鈥檚 a Cal 551 as mentioned above but even if the dial is clean and movement is correct, the case condition is rather hard to get past so you would want it to be very cheap indeed, slightly above melt value
Probably below melt value, if the online weight suggestions are correct. So not really much downside.
 
Posts
13,447
Likes
18,658
The main problem is the bezel is missing
It sure is! I've seen several similar watches with missing bezels the last few months. Not sure why that would happen, as they are on there pretty tight. Maybe a little gold harvesting by a previous owner?
gatorcpa
 
Posts
19
Likes
16
OK. I now have the watch. Serial number 21211216. According to the magical internet, this indicates manufacture in 1964. If correct, that would be a bonus, as it's my birth year. See photos attaced of movement, face and inside case cover. It runs and keeps decent time. Vs my phone, it appears to have gained about 5 seconds in one hour. So one minute per day. In person it looks better than it does in the photos. With sympathetic cleaning and service, it could look decent.
What hopes to find a bezel?

 
Posts
34,915
Likes
39,479
No chance of finding one but you can have one made out of 18K, it helps to have a dogleg with a sharp case as a reference for the goldsmith to go off but they can do it without much difficulty
 
Posts
19
Likes
16
I had some PolyWatch so cleaned up the crystal a little. To me, the dial looks reasonable, but there is some dirt or deposits around 11 o'clock.

 
Posts
91
Likes
135
I was looking so hard at the lugs I didn鈥檛 even even look at the bezel
Me, too! And now that you mention it, I wonder how I missed it. But yes, a bezel would help. 馃榿
 
Posts
145
Likes
120
Ooof, this watch is a project and a half. Movement will need a service for sure. Getting a bezel made is going to be your option if you really want to wear it. Sadly the case is in very poor condition too. Not sure if the dial can be cleaned around 11 o'clock or will rather be destroyed even more in the process. Depends if the lacquer has been affected or not.
Question is: How much did you pay and how much are you willing to invest in it? And doens't it make more sense to let this one go and get a nicer watch for that total price..
 
Posts
3,763
Likes
6,395
21 mil movement doesn't go with black painted hour markers.
 
Posts
6,481
Likes
10,011
21 mil movement doesn't go with black painted hour markers.
good call...