Basic watchmaking tips - Hand removal and installation

Posts
274
Likes
266
Such an awesome post, and on a topic that may seem trivial to the layman — but in reality is a delicate and highly ‘error-prone’ procedure.

I say that because all my luxury Swiss watches have hour hand misalignments to various degrees. They came this way from the factory, and it really does bother me.

I hope all watchmakers are as meticulous as you are, Al. The ones I’ve dealt with have always left their ‘tracks’ either in caseback scratches, dust on the dial, large hour hand and dial misalignments after servicing, etc.
 
Posts
4,913
Likes
17,126
The size and scale is mind-boggling. I can read this and mentally understand it but I can't get my head wrapped around the amount of pressure involved.

It seems like those pants could still cause a dimple in the dial with enough prying. Or the feet could create a pressure point and leave a crease.

Breitling was hammering the hands on?!! I don't understand how the post/pinion wouldn't be at risk of bending. Seems like you'd have to hit it dead center and straight on.

When you press the hands on, are you eye balling the division? What about the amount of pressure? Seems like it'd be easy to apply too much force, especially considering the difference in new versus old hands.

For old lume in hands, what exactly is stabilization? I assumed it was some sort of clear lacquer applied to the underside of the hands and lume, which acts as a glue. Is this close?

Are some hand finishes more delicate? I assume painted would be more susceptible to cracking and damage then steel or blued. It's a wonder that there aren't more chipped hands on watches.

Thanks for the insights. Pretty fascinating.
 
Posts
27,318
Likes
69,682
The pants don’t leave a mark...they are safe. This is the technique that Omega teaches.

I’m sure it’s just a tap of the hand that Breitling does, but that’s enough to make the hand nearly impossible to remove without damage.

Yes, the division is set by eye...no one would actually measure this.

The pressure to seat the hand is something you get a feel for. Hands have to be fitted sometimes as I mentioned, and this is to be able to get them far enough down on the tapered post, without using too much force,

Stabilization is done with the clear binder (lacquer) applied to the back of the hand.

Painted finishes can be delicate, which is why the tips of the hand installer must be free of defects. It’s a process that seems simple but requires a good deal of care. Often something people struggle with when starting out.

Cheers, Al
 
Posts
2,016
Likes
4,104
Hands and oils, 2 fears I need to overcome this year. Thanks for all your assistance and the phenomenal instructional.
 
Posts
670
Likes
6,551
Hand removal is easy. I just use an old pair of scissors...slide them right in under the hour hand...none of that mamby pamby plastic to get in the way. Sure it removes a bunch of paint, but I just call it "patina" and carry on with gorilla gluing in the crystal...and any other parts that come loose. 👍
 
Posts
604
Likes
1,983
Hi Al,

Thanks for this great and detailed tutorial. Interestingly some professionals seem to oppose the use of the levers. I personally agree that they provide much more "feel". They are, of course, nothing for rather heavy handed persons, who then tend to bend arbors by uneven action.

And long ago, doing this the first time, I learned the lesson with the bag. After having spent some time searching for the removed hand on the floor 😁.

Instead of self-made "pants" I use such Bergeon dial protectors.

Cheers, Bernhard

 
Posts
27,318
Likes
69,682
Glad you found it helpful. I can't say as I've ever come across a professional who is against using levers. Some prefer the Presto style removers, but also use levers for tight subdial hands. We all have our preferences, so it's not unusual to see them, but being opposed to using them is just not something I've come across. Were there reasons given from these professionals you have encountered?

The Bergeon thing is useful if you are doing simple 3 hand watches for example, as it protects the dial pretty well. I have one in a drawer here somewhere I'm sure. But it doesn't serve the same function as the pants, as those protect the dial and elevates the surface you are resting the levers on.

I service many watches with tall stacks of hands, so there may be a double stack in the subdials, applied markers on the dial, then a series of central hands - common one is an Omega 1151 (based on the ETA 7751) as shown below:



You can see that there are two subdial hands where the constant seconds are at 9 o'clock (seconds and 24 hour hand) and above that in the central hand stack there is a date hand, hour hand, minute hand, and chronograph seconds recording hand. There are also applied markers on the dial, so the lowest of the central stack has to clear all that. Removing the tallest hand in a stack, that is also one of the tightest hands, where that stack is very elevated above the dial surface, is quite different than removing hands on a simple 3 hand watch.

When working on more complex watches like this, it's important to raise the surface, because you have more control with the levers when the hands are removed early in the arc of the levers, rather than later in the arc of their movement. This means less chance of applying uneven forces, and the hands are removed when your fingers and the handle of the levers are further away from the dial. Servicing watches involves a lot of risk mitigation, and this is one more thing in a very long list that mitigates risk.

Can you remove higher hands without them? Sure, but given that I've serviced hundreds of just manual winding Speedmasters for example, the accumulated risk exposure is increased compared to someone doing low volumes, simply because I do far more of this work than someone servicing just their own watches. So every effort that can be made to reduce risk should be explored, in particular when some of these watches can approach 6 figures in value.

Cheers, Al
 
Posts
2,465
Likes
2,837
Thank you for sharing this, I have two questions as well, movement specific

Do you think Omega 550 series movements require a specific support for the pushing of the seconds hand, or is it enough to have the auto bridge on to provide support?

For 550 series movements, given the ability, would you pull the seconds hand separately as in your chrono example?
 
Posts
27,318
Likes
69,682
Do you think Omega 550 series movements require a specific support for the pushing of the seconds hand, or is it enough to have the auto bridge on to provide support?

The seconds pinion should be supported by a movement holder. But before you press the hand on, I would recommend inserting a short piece of old mainspring between the pinion and the friction spring, like this:



This will protect the friction spring from becoming deformed when you press the hand on:



For 550 series movements, given the ability, would you pull the seconds hand separately as in your chrono example?

No need - all three hands can be removed at once.
 
Posts
2,465
Likes
2,837
Thank you for the suggestion

Would you recommend the 09-010-25 design movement holder for the 550 series?

Edit: I can only buy stuff from Aliexpress due to political issues, so it's either this or another Chinese copy
Edited:
 
Posts
27,318
Likes
69,682
Thank you for the suggestion

Would you recommend the 09-010-25 design movement holder for the 550 series?

Edit: I can only buy stuff from Aliexpress due to political issues, so it's either this or another Chinese copy

It works...
 
Posts
376
Likes
654
I never realised the 550 series was so close in size to the Rolex 3035.

Thanks to the popularity of Rolex its actually quite easy to source one of those 09.010-25 holders locally, I'll have to grab one next time I'm at the watchmakers supply store.
 
Posts
208
Likes
170
Great read. Many thanks. So it seems that when it comes to 3 handed watches you typically remove them all at once. A benefit of that, it seems, is that there's less of a chance of the seconds hand becoming distorted and separated from the rivet and/or pipe. The hand beneath it provides a 360 degree contact with the underside of the seconds hand, causing less stress or warping than levers that would just be pressing up on 2 sides of the seconds hand, no? So you don't condone pulling all the hands off on a watch with more than 3 central hands? Is this because chrono seconds hands are on tighter? And perhaps to prevent damage to the post or underlying components?
 
Posts
27,318
Likes
69,682
Great read. Many thanks. So it seems that when it comes to 3 handed watches you typically remove them all at once. A benefit of that, it seems, is that there's less of a chance of the seconds hand becoming distorted and separated from the rivet and/or pipe. The hand beneath it provides a 360 degree contact with the underside of the seconds hand, causing less stress or warping than levers that would just be pressing up on 2 sides of the seconds hand, no? So you don't condone pulling all the hands off on a watch with more than 3 central hands? Is this because chrono seconds hands are on tighter? And perhaps to prevent damage to the post or underlying components?

It depends on the watch - GMT's have more than 3 hands, and I take all those off at once. For chronographs, yes the central hand is typically on very tight, so trying to take them all off at once is not a good idea...
 
Posts
208
Likes
170
Thank you. One other question regarding the running seconds hand of an Omega 1040 movement. This hand is installed over a separate "floating" subdial. Are there any special precautions you'd have about removing or installing this hand?
Edited:
 
Posts
27,318
Likes
69,682
Thank you. One other question regarding the running seconds hand of an Omega 1040 movement. This hand is installed over a separate "floating" subdial. Are there any special precautions you'd have about removing or installing this hand?
View attachment 1751987

Not really - just protect the dial on removal, and when you are installing you are still just pressing a hand on a post.
 
Posts
77
Likes
43
Hand removal and installation is a topic I’ve wanted to cover for a while, and it is a task that can often cause those new to watchmaking some difficulty. It’s also a task that can be fraught with danger to the hands and dial, so it’s one that seems simple but deserves some respect when doing the task.

I'll start with hand removal, and I’ll show the tools that I use. Tweezers are the first thing - all hands are handled with specific tweezers made for hands that have highly polished surfaces that won’t damage the hands:



Note that there are options out there, ranging from the style I use, to tweezers with wooden or plastic tips, or you can even wrap some tape around a pair of tweezers you have to prevent damage in a pinch.

Next I use hand levers, and I’ve tried different methods to remove hands, but I find these offer the most control:



There are two sizes, one for smaller hands and one for larger hands – these specific levers are made by VOH, and one reason I like them is the long flat section after the curve. Some other levers have steps in the diameter very close to the tips, and those can possibly contact the dial if you are not very careful, where these have more room to “lever” before anything come close to damaging the dial:



Next, Omega refers to as “pants” as they are shaped a bit like a pair of pants. These are made of a heavy plastic that is is used for wrapping up watches for shipping, and when stacked they stick to each other, but not to anything else. I’ve stacked these and cut them into the shape you see, and the height can be customized by adding or removing layers.



Lastly you need a plastic baggie - I get tons of these containing parts, so they are always plentiful.

I start by removing the sub-dial hands, as I don’t want them in the way when removing the other hands. I lay the plastic bag over the hands, and use the small hand levers to remove those:



Next the central chronograph hand. I line up the hour, and minute hands under the chronograph hand, and I then place the pants of the appropriate height onto the dial. What I want is to have the surface that the levers will work against be nearly the same height as the underside of the chronograph hand:



I then place the plastic bag over all of this:



The small hand levers are used to tuck the bag under the hand, and then lever it off. Since this hand is on tightly, it will sometimes come off with some force, and you will hear a snap sound. The top plastic bag makes sure that the hand doesn’t move much at all during this process, in particular the end of the hand where there is often a section that is lumed. Failing to do this can allow the whiplash that occurs at the end of the hand to cause the lume to fly out of the hand.

Next is the removal of the hour and minute hands, and those are removed together. If you try to get between them to remove them one at a time, it is sometimes possible, but there is risk of possibly scratching the top part of the hour hand. So back to just using the plastic baggie, and using the large hand levers to get under both hands, and gently pry them off:



This process protects both the hands and the dial, and if done properly shouldn’t result in any damage from forces require to remove the hands on most dials (there are very delicate dials that require special procedures). There is always some risk involved in doing this, so in my experience this is the best method to mitigate that risk.

The hands are then stored away properly to prevent damage. There are several ways of doing this, but I use the same packaging that Omega uses for storing and shipping complete hand sets:



For installation of the hands, we need to start with the dial, and hopefully the reasoning for that will become clear. One thing that drives me crazy is hand misalignments, and this is partly because preventing misalignments is usually very easily done. First we should talk about the hour wheel and dial washer. The hour wheel is the wheel that the hour hand attaches to, and unless there is some sort of calendar plate that goes on top of the hour wheel, it can really just be pulled straight off the movement as nothing holds it in place other than the dial.



On top of the hour wheel there is often something called a dial washer, or as Omega sometimes calls it, a metal foil. It’s a curved disk with a hole in it, and it goes on top of the hour wheel:



This is an hour wheel with the dial washer attached, so they can’t be separated. Omega does this on many modern calibers and it prevents the dial washer from being lost:





The hour wheel can freely move up and down under the dial, and the dial washer helps put just a slight amount of tension on the hour wheel to keep it seated. This performs 2 functions:

1 – To prevent the hour wheel from lifting up and skipping a tooth when the watch is turned dial down, causing the hour and minute hands to go out of sync.

2 – To act as a friction spring to take up some backlash in the hour wheel, resulting in smoother movement of the hands.

When you install the dial, you should check the end shake on the hour wheel, making sure that it cannot lift up too far too easily.

Once this is done, we now need to look at the centering of the dial on the movement. Good hand alignment starts with a properly centered dial. Here’s an example – this dial is clearly not centered properly:



You can see this in both the central hole, and the hole for the sub-seconds dial. So how do you center the dial? To do that we need some things, and one is a piece of wood – I’ve taken this piece of wood and traced out the approximate radius of the dial on one end, and use my scroll saw to cut it out:



Next you need a good movement holder, and a small watchmaker’s hammer:



You place the movement in the holder, and place it against a solid item that won’t move (I use the slot for my bench vise), then place the wood up to the dial, and tap the other end with the hammer to center the dial:



My advise here is to go slow, light taps is all that is required. The result after centering:





Note that I have on occasion run across a dial with m ore than one hole in it, where centering the main hole in the middle of the dial, meant that another hole was not centered - the holes in the dial weren't spaced properly. In a case like this, I will prioritize the central hole as that will be most visible regarding hand alignment.

So now we will go back to a Speedmaster to illustrate the hand installation. First another overview of the tools I use, and I start with the movement holders – these are specifically designed for use when installing hands, but can also be very useful in some cases for assembling the dial side of the movement. These holders have adjustable supports in them to support the jewels when pressing the hands on:



The support is typically moved using a screwdriver, and it should be brought up to the underside of whatever jewel is being pressed on.

For hand installation, I use a hand press, and my press has a feature called a decentering plate:



The post in the middle of this plate centers the movement holder for the various hands that are installed – you can see the holes on the underside of the movement holder:



One thing you want to make sure of is that whatever you use to press the hands on, that the surface that will come in contact with the hands is in good condition – difficult to see here since it’s all white, but the tips of the runner for my hand press are something I check regularly, and if they are damaged in any way I clean them up, usually by taking them to the lathe and taking a skim cut off the end:



If these tips are damaged and have burrs on them, they can create uneven pressure on the hand surfaces, and with painted hands this may cause paint to flake off. On to install some hands.

The dial is installed:



I now select the correct runners for my hand press:



Note that there are many different tools that have been used for hand installation, and some are better than others. I find a hand press is valuable for helping install the hands parallel to the dial, and properly aligned. There are individual hand held tools for installing hands, but they are less effective/efficient than a proper hand press.

When installing hands, you generally start with the hands that are closest to the dial first, and on a chronograph that will be the sub-dial hands. Here you can see that decentering plate in action, as the constant seconds hand is installed:



All the hands are installed now:



Now if a hand doesn’t go on perfectly lined up, I would resist the temptation to press down on the hand and “twist” the runner in the press to try to move the hand on the post. This will often just damage the paint or finish on the hand, so if you don’t get it on right the first try, remove the hand and install it again.

Next we install the hour hand, and on a no date watch it can just be pressed on anywhere. For a watch with date, you would advance the hands until the date change, then install the hand right when the date flips over. After installing the hour hand, back it up 1 hour to 11 o’clock:



Then move it forward again to hit the 12 exactly, and without touching the crown, press the minute hand on:



This will assist in getting the hand aligned properly, but I always check it around the dial:







On a watch with date, this is where you would check the accuracy of the date change, to ensure it meets the tolerances of the brand. If it’s all good, you can now install the chronograph seconds recording hand:





One thing I haven’t mentioned yet is called division. This is the spacing of the hands from the dial and to each other. It’s difficult to photograph well, but what you are looking for generally is that the hour hand (or whatever central hand is closest to the dial) is spaced away from the dial an equal amount to what the minute hand is spaced away from the hour hand, and then the second hand away from the minute hand. The hands should be evenly spaced and parallel to the dial. Of course the hour hand should clear any sub-dial hands or raised marker on the dial.

This was a long post, so I will talk about some problems related to hands and hand fitting in a follow-up post. As always, questions are welcome.

Hope this helps.

Cheers, Al
Thanks very informative.100%