BaselWorld 2018: Introducing The New Omega Seamaster Diver 300M

Posts
273
Likes
888
Anyone that keeps has seen my posts will know I do not prefer skeleton hands. However this new models with a tweaked hour hand improves the look of the watch a lot to me especially with the date moved to 6 o'clock. I must say that the current flat dial seems like a better fit - I just think they needed something to make the new watch stand out against the 41mm; mostly for non WIS people.

It seems the whole Blake Sword era is really over and this is what they are sticking with. Looking at it now they were offering two flavours of the same watch to expand they're market appeal. I hate to say it, those of us who liked the Blake models will never get it back in the 300 diver line. The Planet Ocean is the current Blake side and it's case is not pleasing to me anyway.

In short I think I may eventually own one as it seems better than a Rolex sub. Even the two tone versions look really good.

Now I'll go back to imagining this new 42 case and bezel with updated 2230 dial with blake hands.

This rendition reminds me of my experience of trying "Cajun" food at a restaurant after moving from New Orleans to Stockholm, Sweden. It had the right name (Gumbo), it looked like gumbo, but it did not taste like gumbo. I did not like it, but everyone else who had never had "real gumbo" thought it was great.

I think it is a great looking watch, but only if you allow it to stand alone and not compare it to previous models, especially the 2254 and 2531. If one loves sword hands then they should just buy a used 2254 or other sword hands model and wear it and love it. If I want real gumbo, I order it when I go back to New Orleans.

The problem I have now is... do I spend roughly $2,000 on a used 2531 or buy a grey market new seamaster ceramic for $2700? I wanted the new watch to solve this dilemma for me, but it has not. Wave dial and a classic or more bang for the buck.
 
Posts
2,042
Likes
5,481
Not a bad attempt in my opinion, but I wouldn't trade my sword hands model in against it 馃槑
 
Posts
230
Likes
195
This rendition reminds me of my experience of trying "Cajun" food at a restaurant after moving from New Orleans to Stockholm, Sweden. It had the right name (Gumbo), it looked like gumbo, but it did not taste like gumbo. I did not like it, but everyone else who had never had "real gumbo" thought it was great.

I think it is a great looking watch, but only if you allow it to stand alone and not compare it to previous models, especially the 2254 and 2531. If one loves sword hands then they should just buy a used 2254 or other sword hands model and wear it and love it. If I want real gumbo, I order it when I go back to New Orleans.

The problem I have now is... do I spend roughly $2,000 on a used 2531 or buy a grey market new seamaster ceramic for $2700? I wanted the new watch to solve this dilemma for me, but it has not. Wave dial and a classic or more bang for the buck.

Great analogy. I just bought a 2254 and it's on it's way to join my 2534. The 2254 is in transit as we speak with the bonus of a 2230 dial. Eventually I will build my ultimate smp with black SMPc case, 1610 bracelet, 2230 dial along with the blake hands. If I like the result I will source a 2254 dial and restore my 2254 to stock.

If I were you I'd pick up the SMPc for 700 more and it's a a huge upgrade over the 2531. The clean dial is really something that grows on you. But then if you're thinking 2531 you should then think harder! 2220.80 is the winner if you want all the best of the wave dial with applied indies and 2500 movement. Problem with the 2220 is not as low in price as the 2531.
 
Posts
2,675
Likes
7,487
I've never been a fan of the Seamaster 300M and nothing in the new releases changes that for me.

I'd rather wear this $147 diver any day, to each their own...
 
Posts
230
Likes
195
I've never been a fan of the Seamaster 300M and nothing in the new releases changes that for me.

I'd rather wear this $147 diver any day, to each their own...

Hey what model is that?
 
Posts
29,221
Likes
75,514
From an aesthetic point of view...

Pros compared to the old version are that I like this bracelet better (even though I suspect it will be tougher to refinish), and I like these skeleton hands more than the originals. I like the wave dial and the new date location.

Cons are the added thickness (even though it's not much) and the HEV. The thickness could have been much worse though, so even that I'm not too strongly against given the sapphire case back.
 
Posts
256
Likes
293
My blue SMP 300 which I bought new last year has been my favorite watch. I have two Rolex models which cost two to three times as much, but my blue Omega has still been my favorite. But I鈥檝e lusted for the wave dial. I鈥檝e been holding off on buying anything this year in anticipation of what has possibly been to come from Basel. Now I鈥檓 happy that I have waited. The wave dial will definitely be my next purchase.
Edited:
 
Posts
273
Likes
888
Great analogy. I just bought a 2254 and it's on it's way to join my 2534. The 2254 is in transit as we speak with the bonus of a 2230 dial. Eventually I will build my ultimate smp with black SMPc case, 1610 bracelet, 2230 dial along with the blake hands. If I like the result I will source a 2254 dial and restore my 2254 to stock.

If I were you I'd pick up the SMPc for 700 more and it's a a huge upgrade over the 2531. The clean dial is really something that grows on you. But then if you're thinking 2531 you should then think harder! 2220.80 is the winner if you want all the best of the wave dial with applied indies and 2500 movement. Problem with the 2220 is not as low in price as the 2531.

That is a problem, as the 2220 is almost the price of a brand new SMPc. I may need to go over to my AD and ask to try one on again, just to give it a second look. Thanks for the tip!
 
Posts
227
Likes
628
Ooh, I like this new SMP, especially in black. The 2531.80 was the first nice watch I bought for myself. I miss the wave dial, and I鈥檓 glad it鈥檚 back.
 
Posts
415
Likes
489
The black dial is looking good and may overtake a Globemaster on my wish list.
 
Posts
996
Likes
1,863
I'm all in on the grey dial version!!! 馃グ

I'm a fan of the original, controversial bracelet, He valve, and skeleton hands included, so this one is a winner to me. That said, if I am going to nit-pick, it appears the new bezel overwhelms the dial a bit, at least in pictures. My last two purchases have been Breitlings, looks like Omega is on deck. 馃槑
 
Posts
75
Likes
77
Decent effort and good price point to maintain this watch as a gateway to the brand. Misses for me include the conical shape of the helium escape valve, the ugly bracelet end links (though helpful to mitigate the increased case diameter) and the half-hearted realization of the much-heralded return to the wave dial. Hits are just about everything else, including the apparent lack of case height increase.
 
Posts
150
Likes
494
Favorite part, at the moment:
It's stamped "diver" on the back, making it officially a professional watch. I think that's a pretty cool addition, even though the SMPs have always met ISO standards.
 
Posts
12,107
Likes
40,239
These aren't watches that I tend to go for but - are my eyes being tricked or are they thinner than the other diver models? The photos make it look ~2/3 as thick as the PO
 
Posts
2,845
Likes
9,196
So to be clear is this the new SMPc?

I know omega is really pushing to only out out METAS watches, so it is no surprise that the put that movement in here. That being said it would have been really hard to keep it at 41mm without creating a new movement which I assume they don't have?

I also like the 41mm. I definitely want to see this one in person.
 
Posts
319
Likes
596
The return of the wave dial is great. The rubber strap is very nice alternative to the bracelet.
 
Posts
1,672
Likes
8,793
I like the wave dial as well. Never been a huge fan of the skeleton hands though...
 
Posts
358
Likes
1,026
I liked the original wave dial and thought the Seamaster had lost it's look with the flat shiny dial.
Omega have done a great makeover on this model line.