Authenticity check for 168.005

Posts
2
Likes
0
Hi,

I'm considering this watch. It's a blind buy as I don't have the opportunity to see it in person before buying.
There's no picture of the caseback and only a rather crappy one of the movement. Serial number starts with 2097.
It's claimed to be from 1963.
Do you see any pitfalls here besides buying blind obviously?

Thanks in advance.
 
Posts
498
Likes
407
What’s the story with where you’ve found this, and what’s the price? To be honest it looks like a nice watch. The pics aren’t the best, but it looks in good shape, despite some signs of being polished in the past (but the chamfers are still visible slightly on the lugs, so I’ve seen a lot worse before). I can see clearly an original dial, and correct crown and original crystal. However if you don’t give an idea of the price then it’s hard to say.
 
Posts
3,181
Likes
12,504
In short: move on.

The watch is ok. It’s seen some polishing, but it’s not too bad. Dial seems pretty good, you’d want further pictures of the sides and a few angles to see if it looks ok all around, and I’d want to know if it was actually serviced by a watchmaker with a receipt or if it was just bought from a dealer who claimed he had it done.

But. And it’s a big but. 2300€? Hell no. Of the date versions of the doglegs, 168.005 and 14902, Omega produced multiple times the amount of their dateless sisters. These aren’t uncommon watches by any means and a few pop up in the classifieds here regularly. I’m not saying half the price is realistic, you could definitely save yourself 800-1000€ here with some patience and time investment.

If you’re ready to open the wallet wide enough and don’t want to invest time, I get that. But then, may I suggest buying from a reputable dealer at the same amount or, quite possibly, even less, and enjoy the right of return and maybe a year of warranty?