kaplan
·Some even have portraits on dials
Not the case, they just don't detail dials anymore for regular customers as far as I know, you need to have a contact
Other than that, extracts say they are delivered to NK, so in this case the delivery location is enough to verify
I'm sad for my Arabic dial, it's kind of a deluxe model in white gold, Omega couldn't care less though, it's a very historically significant watch, they didn't show 1% of 1% of the interest Longines representatives showed for a regular pocketwatch
So you are saying that Omega printed everything on these dials, and is withholding the information just for spite?
Not for spite but rather an arbitrary decision not to detail dials for those who don't have inside connections. They 100% didn't print locally, because some dials are completely unique out of factory, they displaced the logo/star etc.. And in the past they issues certificates with dial information as well.
Can you give one example of a coloured dial being detailed on an EOA for a regular person in the recent years @Archer?
I don't know why you are acting this way as normally you are very logical
As far as I know, it's a known fact that Omega doesn't give dial detailing any more, I may be mistaken, can you share some extracts that they recently issues that includes dial detailing?
That's strange. Why would they choose to withhold information if those were recorded in the archives?
Was there a line for the dial and was there any input for that? Or was it just completely omitted from the extract?
I think you might want to be more proactive if you are serious. I wouldn't expect highly connected people to voluntarily share their precious and carefully cultivated contacts with a stranger.
I don't think they withhold information, but as an outsider to the process, it was my deduction that they only make judgement calls for certain people
I wondered where I got this impression, and I think it's a mix of ambient reading, the Speedmaster EOA issues, and this reply on this specific thread: https://omegaforums.net/threads/ext...-is-wrong-yes-correction-issued.150932/page-2
Thank you for the suggestion. I could not find contact information for the Omega Museum itself, but there is information for Cité du Temps in which the museum is housed. I will go ahead and contact them to see if they can explain (and ideally correct) the discrepancy. I don't have much confidence working through my Omega Boutique, but perhaps if I can reach someone at the archives directly, they can rectify the error.
Thanks for the tip. If the Omega museum doesn’t respond, I’ll try that next. I did get an acknowledgment from Cité du Temps, so that may turn out to be productive.
Hey, it could be worse - they could treat you like Rolex. They supply parts to independent watchmakers (for a lot of calibers anyway), they have a vintage database, and have both an extract and authentication service.
Rolex gives you zero information, no respect at all for vintage watches, and hey guess what we won't even bother fixing some things you own, that really aren't even very old!
Omega could be better, but also could be much worse...
It'll be hard for me to quote this, and to be honest I don't want to spend an hour to track the source, but there was a mention of asking a specific person to apply for an extract for the best result
I recall reading this on the forum, but it could have been a private discussion or read somewhere else
I don't think this is on topic or applies to me though, I assumed it was just a Speedmaster thing, getting their Ultraman's recognized etc. - I just want my extracts to say blue dial, red dial, matte black dial, baton diamonds etc.
Sadly I don't have the contacts or 240 CHF as an investment to run a test trial, and I doubt after this discussion anyone with connections would be willing to help me to run the second test 😁
That, I can confirm. I took a Cal.1530 Submariner to the Beverly Hills Service Center, hoping to have it serviced. They told me that because of the movement's age (and presumed scarcity of parts) they would not service it for me unless I could provide proof that I'm the original owner. Seriously. The watch was 55+ years old then, and there is a very good chance that the original owner has been dead for some time.
There's no doubt some people have contacts at the museum. If they leverage those contacts, good for them I guess. I just don't see that this is specifically what makes Omega a bad company...or a company I should feel badly about. Again, they do far more for vintage collectors than most do, but several phrases apply...
No good deed goes unpunished...
You can't please evryone...
Etc.
This argument doesn't justify not treating everyone the same,
Plus EOA's aren't free, so those phrases certainly don't apply in this case
You don't have to feel personally attacked either,
they should definitely improve EOA process though