You wouldn’t be the only one with some skepticism about how Scott (1) came to have the Bulova on board without NASA’s knowledge or permission, and (2) came to then have it in his suit pocket for the EVA, etc.
Alan Nelson, who in 1993 famously wrote the Speedmaster History piece that included the extensive FOIR materials around the Bulova controversy in 1978, later in
2019 wrote a 26-year follow-up and addressed the Scott Bulova incident in rather skeptical (indicting) terms:
So, while on one hand there were reports of other watch crystals popping off (one report known, below) and so Scott’s claim on that metric alone is not suspect as others have mentioned, on the other hand there are additional facts that mean you would not be alone is having a slightly jaundiced eye on the whole event.
Note that Nelson’s own skepticism likely is informed by his extensive research on the Bulova company’s decade-long effort to use political pressures in Washington to have the Speedmaster replaced, and some of the lengths the company went to in that effort.
Separately, on the topic of the one other crystal loss noted in official documents, while
@SpeedyPhill above posted the official report language, I’ll below attach the astronaut’s report that served as the basis of it.
But to round out the Scott issue: it is interesting and perhaps some indirect evidence that while the
other crystal loss has been found in various NASA reports, I don’t know of official NASA reports that do a similar “lessons learned about hardware” look-back regarding the Scott incident.