DoctorEvil
·Greetings and hope everyone is in good health.
My purchase of a Speedmaster FOIS a couple of years ago has sparked a newfound interest in the US manned space flight programme, the race to the moon and the Speedmaster's role in it. And with the impending 50th Anniversary of Apollo 15, I wish to seek your opinions regarding a topic that has had me intrigued.
Some of you may recall that David Scott (Apollo 15 mission commander) had taken with him a Bulova Chronograph as part of his personal effects, supposedly as a backup for his issued Speedy. He subsequently wore it on the lunar surface during the third EVA, claiming that the crystal on his issued Speedy had popped off during the second EVA. This Bulova watch was auctioned off for $1.6mil a few years ago. I've included a link to an interview with Dave Scott for those unfamiliar with the background.
https://www.fratellowatches.com/fratello-watches-qa-with-apollo-15-astronaut-dave-scott/
What particularly intrigues me is this:
Given that this is the only known instance (to my knowledge) where a Speedmaster has failed in space, it seems like more than just mere coincidence that there was a Bulova Chronograph on hand to act as a backup. Bulova at the time was an American owned watch company that had tried unsuccessfully to pressure NASA into ditching the Speedmaster and using its watches instead as the official astronaut's watch. In the interview with Scott, he said that Bulova had given him this watch to "evaluate" in space.
My question is this:
Could Scott have deliberately damaged his Speedy so that he would then have an excuse to wear the Bulova on the moon? Scott might even have received a kickback for it. For Bulova, it would have been a small price to pay for a huge public relations coup as it would mean that it's rival Omega could no longer use the advertising slogan of "The Only Watch Worn On The Moon". It's not out of the realms of possibility given that the Apollo 15 astronauts were also mired in the "First Day Covers" scandal where they had taken about 400 unauthorised first day covers (envelopes with commemorative stamps and postmarks) with them and some of these were subsequently sold by a third party for a huge profit. The astronauts themselves were to have been paid for doing this but they claimed that they later refused payment.
https://www.nytimes.com/1972/07/12/...ded-apollo-15-astronauts-are-reprimanded.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_15_postal_covers_incident
Apologies if this topic has already been covered in a previous thread, but I'd love to do a poll and hear from as many people as possible on this subject. What do you all think? Did he do it?
Thanks in advance for your time.
My purchase of a Speedmaster FOIS a couple of years ago has sparked a newfound interest in the US manned space flight programme, the race to the moon and the Speedmaster's role in it. And with the impending 50th Anniversary of Apollo 15, I wish to seek your opinions regarding a topic that has had me intrigued.
Some of you may recall that David Scott (Apollo 15 mission commander) had taken with him a Bulova Chronograph as part of his personal effects, supposedly as a backup for his issued Speedy. He subsequently wore it on the lunar surface during the third EVA, claiming that the crystal on his issued Speedy had popped off during the second EVA. This Bulova watch was auctioned off for $1.6mil a few years ago. I've included a link to an interview with Dave Scott for those unfamiliar with the background.
https://www.fratellowatches.com/fratello-watches-qa-with-apollo-15-astronaut-dave-scott/
What particularly intrigues me is this:
Given that this is the only known instance (to my knowledge) where a Speedmaster has failed in space, it seems like more than just mere coincidence that there was a Bulova Chronograph on hand to act as a backup. Bulova at the time was an American owned watch company that had tried unsuccessfully to pressure NASA into ditching the Speedmaster and using its watches instead as the official astronaut's watch. In the interview with Scott, he said that Bulova had given him this watch to "evaluate" in space.
My question is this:
Could Scott have deliberately damaged his Speedy so that he would then have an excuse to wear the Bulova on the moon? Scott might even have received a kickback for it. For Bulova, it would have been a small price to pay for a huge public relations coup as it would mean that it's rival Omega could no longer use the advertising slogan of "The Only Watch Worn On The Moon". It's not out of the realms of possibility given that the Apollo 15 astronauts were also mired in the "First Day Covers" scandal where they had taken about 400 unauthorised first day covers (envelopes with commemorative stamps and postmarks) with them and some of these were subsequently sold by a third party for a huge profit. The astronauts themselves were to have been paid for doing this but they claimed that they later refused payment.
https://www.nytimes.com/1972/07/12/...ded-apollo-15-astronauts-are-reprimanded.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_15_postal_covers_incident
Apologies if this topic has already been covered in a previous thread, but I'd love to do a poll and hear from as many people as possible on this subject. What do you all think? Did he do it?
Thanks in advance for your time.