Anyone see the Seamaster Aqua Terra Ultra Light in the wild yet?

Posts
21,773
Likes
49,406
But the wheels are the same, at least it only indicates that the plates and bridges are Ti...

I missed that part.
 
Posts
2,510
Likes
3,729
This watch warrants at most a $1500 premium over a standard Aqua Terra. I actually like the way it looks, but wouldn't even consider it at $7k. I can't figure what market they are going for with this. It's overpriced by more than $40K.
 
Posts
69
Likes
97
This watch warrants at most a $1500 premium over a standard Aqua Terra. I actually like the way it looks, but wouldn't even consider it at $7k. I can't figure what market they are going for with this. It's overpriced by more than $40K.
Maybe trying to attract Richard Mille aficionados??
 
Posts
1,023
Likes
1,018
I personally love the look minus the band. Take that off and find a proper strap or titanium bracelet and I'd be a buyer if it weren't priced to the moon.
 
Posts
28,067
Likes
71,673
IMO this is a showcase watch, rather than something they really expect to sell a lot of...
 
Posts
10,104
Likes
48,512
Yeah I actually dig the look of it. I don’t understand the pricing but this is the watch world I don’t understand a lot about pricing in the watch world.
 
Posts
229
Likes
333
bump

while I see listings on Chr.... are these watches actually at the boutiques to see and touch and feel?
 
Posts
16,771
Likes
35,152
......................
Less friction? If the pivots of the wheels are riding in jewels that are mounted in titanium, brass, German silver, etc., the amount of friction stays the same.

You'd better stick to watchmaking Al, you'd never make it in marketing.

😉
 
Posts
260
Likes
557
I believe Rory McIlroy wears one, even during competition. But then again, his income bracket is off the charts....
 
Posts
408
Likes
354
I believe Rory McIlroy wears one, even during competition. But then again, his income bracket is off the charts....

Omega pretty much made this for him to market so that makes sense, regardless of his income bracket. I'd happily wear this watch for its looks but for the money I would purchase something else. Something cool to look at with little to no practical value, like a tourbillon (seriously too).
 
Posts
848
Likes
1,747
I believe Rory McIlroy wears one, even during competition. But then again, his income bracket is off the charts....
He does, but he sure didn't pay anything for it
 
Posts
260
Likes
557
Omega pretty much made this for him to market so that makes sense, regardless of his income bracket. I'd happily wear this watch for its looks but for the money I would purchase something else. Something cool to look at with little to no practical value, like a tourbillon (seriously too).
Yeah, the income bracket was tongue in cheek.because of the price of the watch. There's a Hodinkee video where he talks about being a brand ambassador, but actually paying for a tourbillon out of his own pocket.
 
Posts
21
Likes
53
Armand Duplantis wore it in one of the most epic moments in recent athletics history...
 
Posts
6
Likes
4
I am considering the Ultra Light. For context: I have a Speedmaster DSOTM Pitch Black and a Seamaster 300 ceramic/titanium. So I like ceramics and titanium as well light watches. Agree the Ultra Light has some RM comparisons, especially on the movement, but less on the looks. I have one on hold in blue, but want to see the red in comparison before deciding. Wonder if the red fits the overall look better, or if the blue is the better long term choice. Some pic attached. The box I was shown was for the green version, as you can see on the stitching. Green will not be my choice. Red or Blue - thoughts?
 
Posts
2,026
Likes
7,157
I am biased to red in this case… and this piece is likely to sell in very low volumes as I believe this is more like a concept watch than something Omega was/is hoping to sell in the hundreds (let alone thousands) given the price point. That doesn’t mean that it will necessarily appreciate $$$-wise, but since I don’t have a crystal ball anyway, what do i know!?!

Bottom line: If you LOVE it AND can swing it, I say go for it!!!!
Edited:
 
Posts
79
Likes
138
Good looking watch, but no wow factor for me … and 48k is very tough to swallow

but it wear really nice
 
Posts
54
Likes
179
I am considering the Ultra Light. For context: I have a Speedmaster DSOTM Pitch Black and a Seamaster 300 ceramic/titanium. So I like ceramics and titanium as well light watches. Agree the Ultra Light has some RM comparisons, especially on the movement, but less on the looks. I have one on hold in blue, but want to see the red in comparison before deciding. Wonder if the red fits the overall look better, or if the blue is the better long term choice. Some pic attached. The box I was shown was for the green version, as you can see on the stitching. Green will not be my choice. Red or Blue - thoughts?

I think red accents are a better match for this watch
 
Posts
6
Likes
4
Thanks all! I also wonder how timeless this timepiece is. For that price it would be a shame if in 5 or 10 years it looses its appeal. Agree that it will likely not appreciate in value, considering the starting price and fairly special design.
 
Posts
111
Likes
134
I've seen alot of Omega watches but never seen this model out there in real life. I think it is too expensive to start with