This watch warrants at most a $1500 premium over a standard Aqua Terra. I actually like the way it looks, but wouldn't even consider it at $7k. I can't figure what market they are going for with this. It's overpriced by more than $40K.
I believe Rory McIlroy wears one, even during competition. But then again, his income bracket is off the charts....
I believe Rory McIlroy wears one, even during competition. But then again, his income bracket is off the charts....
Omega pretty much made this for him to market so that makes sense, regardless of his income bracket. I'd happily wear this watch for its looks but for the money I would purchase something else. Something cool to look at with little to no practical value, like a tourbillon (seriously too).
I am considering the Ultra Light. For context: I have a Speedmaster DSOTM Pitch Black and a Seamaster 300 ceramic/titanium. So I like ceramics and titanium as well light watches. Agree the Ultra Light has some RM comparisons, especially on the movement, but less on the looks. I have one on hold in blue, but want to see the red in comparison before deciding. Wonder if the red fits the overall look better, or if the blue is the better long term choice. Some pic attached. The box I was shown was for the green version, as you can see on the stitching. Green will not be my choice. Red or Blue - thoughts?