Tony C.
··Ωf Jury memberhaiku for Al 'minimalist' Archer:
should I need to learn
the time half-way 'round the world
I'll just Google it
should I need to learn
the time half-way 'round the world
I'll just Google it
haiku for Al 'minimalist' Archer:
should I need to learn
the time half-way 'round the world
I'll just Google it
Noting that I wear watches in rotation, and rarely have the need to know the time 1/2 way around the world, if I owned this watch and suddenly just had to know the time somewhere else I would likely have to do the following:
1 - pull the watch out of the watch box
2 - wind it
3 - pull up a time reference (time.gov usually, or NRC time here in Canada)
4 - set the time on the watch
5 - then look at the watch to determine the time at the destination I needed to know....
Google is way faster, and as a bonus I get to wear a not fugly watch at the same time. win-win in my books! 😀
I would only politely disagree with you about calling the world timers "fugly".
Certainly, in today's smartphone/net/electronic era, we can tell different time zones other than staring at a dial of a mechanical wristwatch. But, "fugly"? Especially that Tissot @Tony C. shared with us? Sorry, thousand times no. Forever no. 😀
Do world time watches today actually still "work"?
Between my (identical) local and home zone I have 4,5 or 6 hours difference, depending daylight saving time in the northern and southern hemisphere during the year.
Those watches can't cope with that, right? 😕
Thx Al
Do world time watches today actually still "work"?