Any surprises coming up?

Posts
192
Likes
326
Not sure if i like the metal indices and hands. A shiny speedmaster is a bit weird.
 
Posts
259
Likes
632
I'm not pleased with the execution on this one. Now I have to text my SA at the OB and say hard pass. 馃檨

First, I don't like the sunken sundials. It solves the problem of having a two tone dial, but then the dial loses it's integrity.
Second, the glossy look. Too shiny and fancy. The white dial version has the advantage in having the sundials be matted.
Third, the cost. Completely unjustifiable. It's not like you have PP's craftspeople making these things. It's all automated.

Definitely not a day one purchase for me, but wish it was. Hoping instead that I can snatch an SS Rolex GMT or Sub later this year at MSRP.

I do feel good that one of my guesses was that it was a panda of some sort!
 
Posts
353
Likes
3,415
I've struggled with my Ed White being "too shiny and fancy." But it eventually won me over.
I could easily see owning of these in steel at some point. Seems like a great balance between regular Moonwatch sporty and slightly refined dressy.

Cheers,
-GW
 
Posts
94
Likes
62
The "fancier" speedmaster was already the sapphire sandwich. This is just feels like a new model for the sake of releasing a new model.

Slapping an OG ST1 on a brushed bracelet is only a tiny bit more expensive but has a lot more charm.
 
Posts
7,680
Likes
14,204
Like all watches this one will have to be viewed in person to fully understand all the nuances, you just can't do that pictures. The only thing that looks odd to me is the sharp step on the subdials, a bit jarring. Maybe it's less pronounced in person.
 
Posts
2,644
Likes
2,959
Like all watches this one will have to be viewed in person to fully understand all the nuances, you just can't do that pictures. The only thing that looks odd to me is the sharp step on the subdials, a bit jarring. Maybe it's less pronounced in person.
Wrist shot pictures where the watch is at a distance, I don't notice it at all. The reverse panda looks great. Pictures up close and it's really jarring.
 
Posts
187
Likes
560
I just looked in Omega's website and they list the height as 13.54mm.....looks like the websites are all over the map on the crystal.....I just read Time & Tide and they list the following:

"They boast 42mm cases, 13.18mm thick including the Hesalite-simulating boxed sapphire crystal, and are a comfortable 47.5mm across the wrist lug-to-lug."

I don't know who to believe anymore....I'll just have to see it for myself....

https://timeandtidewatches.com/omega-speedmaster-moonwatch-professional-black-and-white-hands-on/

 
Posts
70
Likes
88
I believe it is 13.5x thick, slightly thicker than normal moon watches but still not as thick as snoopy which is 14.55mm
 
Posts
236
Likes
277
Been to see the steel one in the flesh and got a few photos. If you are a collector, I absolutely think it鈥檚 a great addition to what you already have. If you are just starting out, and don鈥檛 have a Speedmaster yet (much like myself), then I would go for the OG first. It鈥檚 really quite beautiful. Shame about the crystal not being the same as what鈥檚 on the FOIS, but hey we can鈥檛 have everything can we? 馃槈

 
Posts
32
Likes
41
Tried it on today, beautiful watch but I'm not yet sure I want it. I also test how it looked with an Omega leather strap I own (sorry for the quality, it's a capture from a video i made).

 
Posts
236
Likes
277
Tried it on today, beautiful watch but I'm not yet sure I want it. I also test how it looked with an Omega leather strap I own (sorry for the quality, it's a capture from a video i made).

Lucky that you were able to see the gold. My OB only had the steel 馃檨
 
Posts
1,978
Likes
2,139
I believe it is 13.5x thick, slightly thicker than normal moon watches but still not as thick as snoopy which is 14.55mm
speedy thickness is super weird with all the crystals around. Since the thickness includes the crystal, all the variation comes from that. And TBH, crystal 'thickness' doesn't really 'count' for me. What you really 'feel' on your wrist is the thickness of the case itself, I wish there was a 'without a crystal thickness' published for each watch so I could honestly compare them.
 
Posts
2,644
Likes
2,959
10K and 50K ... that's no longer a "surprise" ... 馃え
Sadly as consumers, we've gotten used to the constant price hikes on everything. Unfortunately our wages don't experience the same hike.
 
Posts
2,180
Likes
2,354
Sadly as consumers, we've gotten used to the constant price hikes on everything. Unfortunately our wages don't experience the same hike.
Wish they did. Maybe then I鈥檒l have some of these new releases!
 
Posts
7,680
Likes
14,204
There is a 15.5% price difference between the standard black sapphire and the reverse Panda model, feels high to me. I wonder if another general price increase is coming to shrink the difference.
 
Posts
94
Likes
62
How many people are buying new thesedays? A quality secondhand 3861 is had for 4-5k. Even the sedna gold ones are selling for 50% second hand.

If you like the panda but not the price, just give it a year or two - you can pick it up for 4k off.
 
Posts
6,187
Likes
21,186
There is a 15.5% price difference between the standard black sapphire and the reverse Panda model, feels high to me. I wonder if another general price increase is coming to shrink the difference.


How's that old saying go?

You can have a strong currency,
Or you can increase prices.
Or you can have strong sales,
But you can't have all three.
 
Posts
713
Likes
1,086
How many people are buying new thesedays? A quality secondhand 3861 is had for 4-5k. Even the sedna gold ones are selling for 50% second hand.

If you like the panda but not the price, just give it a year or two - you can pick it up for 4k off.
But we need now first hand buyers.
So go get them fresh!
 
Posts
1,978
Likes
2,139
The sales guy from my local OB said they've had a shocking number of folks do full-price orders on these sight-unseen. So either the flippers think this is going to be worth a lot, or this is shockingly popular.