- Posts
- 937
- Likes
- 3,799
qazwsx1
·In general, ‘railtrack’ dials in constellation are uncommon.
This one was the latest in my collection.
It was omega ref. 14393-2, serial no. 17,218,xxx with cal. 561.
In my opinion:
The gold-cap case looks quite good.
The ‘railtrack’ with ‘half-waffle’ dial was original with some nice fading.
The ‘thin’ decagonal crown was original.
The crystal with 'signed omega' plus 'enlarger at date-window' was original too (but this one was special order).
The medallion looks good.
The movement was correct, original and quite clean.
I try to search this dial configuration and found nice example from @cristos71 and another example ,sent to me by @seekingseaquest (but both of them were “stainless steel” case).
Finally, my wrist shot:
Thanks for advice from @cristos71, @ConElPueblo, @seekingseaquest, @Dr No, @Peemacgee, @watchyouwant and others.
If anyone got this dial configuration please share.
Thanks for your kindness comment.
Teerapat
This one was the latest in my collection.
It was omega ref. 14393-2, serial no. 17,218,xxx with cal. 561.
In my opinion:
The gold-cap case looks quite good.
The ‘railtrack’ with ‘half-waffle’ dial was original with some nice fading.
The ‘thin’ decagonal crown was original.
The crystal with 'signed omega' plus 'enlarger at date-window' was original too (but this one was special order).
The medallion looks good.
The movement was correct, original and quite clean.
I try to search this dial configuration and found nice example from @cristos71 and another example ,sent to me by @seekingseaquest (but both of them were “stainless steel” case).
Finally, my wrist shot:
Thanks for advice from @cristos71, @ConElPueblo, @seekingseaquest, @Dr No, @Peemacgee, @watchyouwant and others.
If anyone got this dial configuration please share.
Thanks for your kindness comment.
Teerapat
