1k+ already, looks like someone's on irrespective of the case.
No shot of the inside of the caseback? Guess they don't know how important that is.
Respectable Member dsio
Despite some unhealthy comments by enthusiasts and experts here, and also probably other forums, people still knowingly buy frankens and fakes. As a result of which, the die-hard and unscrupulous elements keep on producing this undesirable and eye-sore rubbish, unabated.
Thank-you.
I wouldn't go that far, there are plenty of great watches around and this could easily be one of them, we just don't know yet
Respectable Member dsio
Let us hope, he genuinely and not conveniently forgot to shoot the inside of the back-cover, for us to see and decide, whether this watch is worth a consideration.
Thank-you.
Respectible Member Seamonster -
I'm afraid that I have to concur with dsio on this one. The only issues I see here is overpolishing and wear to the case from harsh treatment in opening the watch.
I believe that including a photo of the caseback can only increase the amount that the watch will bring in to this seller. Having a qualified watchmaker take a peek behind the dial, looking for the 18K hallmark (that I'm sure is there), can also help enhance the amount ultimately realized.
I really think that this is real deal, just with some condition issues.
gatorcpa
Well the watch sold, for a rather dismal amount at $3,483, which compares to the $4,155 of my example, and $4,500 of my first example.
The biggest reason this watch went low IMO was how it was sold. The seller avoided posting a picture of the caseback, did not reply to requests to see that caseback, made odd remarks about the case in general, that it was rose gold, 18K, and also that it was stainless steel?! in the same slab of text in the listing. Too many red flags and dodgy information.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/OMEGA-VINTAGE-SEAMASTER-CALENDAR-PIE-PAN-18k-gold-/281033004998?_trksid=p2047675.l2557&ssPageName=STRK:MEDWX:IT&nma=true&si=1pEed/OFz+rSnU7uZoBMhdDq6js=&orig_cvip=true&rt=nc
If you sell a watch, you must be precise, and verbose in your description, if you flake around it drives off buyers.
Well the watch sold, for a rather dismal amount at $3,483, which compares to the $4,155 of my example, and $4,500 of my first example.
The biggest reason this watch went low IMO was how it was sold. The seller avoided posting a picture of the caseback, did not reply to requests to see that caseback, made odd remarks about the case in general, that it was rose gold, 18K, and also that it was stainless steel?! in the same slab of text in the listing. Too many red flags and dodgy information.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/OMEGA-VINTAGE-SEAMASTER-CALENDAR-PIE-PAN-18k-gold-/281033004998?_trksid=p2047675.l2557&ssPageName=STRK:MEDWX:IT&nma=true&si=1pEed/OFz+rSnU7uZoBMhdDq6js=&orig_cvip=true&rt=nc
If you sell a watch, you must be precise, and verbose in your description, if you flake around it drives off buyers.
