- Posts
- 221
- Likes
- 280
mikeo1
·I don't know why but whenever I see printed outlines around the perimeter of the subdials/registers on any UG chronograph my first thought is always "redial"
Another another UG compax dial design
- Posts
- 149
- Likes
- 376
- Posts
- 3,211
- Likes
- 7,650
bgrisso
·This watch ended upon eBay, who got it ? Seems like a nice price.
- Posts
- 5,399
- Likes
- 8,439
Mark020
··not the sharpest pencil in the ΩF drawerUSD 2725 is indeed not bad. Ebay name: r***p (1534) 😀
- Posts
- 1,195
- Likes
- 1,975
rolokr
·I know Sala book is a great reference, but members say that some pictures in Sala are re-dial .? So how do you know Sala picture is legit ? I think this one is original though, UG is a bit on the inconsistent side, but obviously this post shows several other similar examples in circulation.
- Posts
- 5,399
- Likes
- 8,439
Mark020
··not the sharpest pencil in the ΩF drawerSome of the watches pictured are/may be. However: I don't think there is a lot of discussion about the catalogue pics.
- Posts
- 149
- Likes
- 376
martinc
·I know Sala book is a great reference, but members say that some pictures in Sala are re-dial .? So how do you know Sala picture is legit ? I think this one is original though, UG is a bit on the inconsistent side, but obviously this post shows several other similar examples in circulation.
I think we all assume that the black and white archive catalogues featured in the book at the end of every chapter come from the factory and as such show only original watches. These archive pics are - at least for me - an unquestionable reference.
On the other hand the watches photographed in color are from private collections and in many cases have flaws - declared or not - some are redials (usually it’s stated in the description), many have incorrect hands, crowns etc.
