Advice on restoration of Vintage Geneve Cal 1010 in Gold case

Posts
13,209
Likes
22,973
Thanks again for the info - so is the case back and front /lugs 9k gold then or just the case back - out of interest which marking is the year of manufacture?
The whole case will be 9ct.

The italic B denotes the date.
375 is gold purity.
Lions head is London Assay office.
 
Posts
17
Likes
11
The whole case will be 9ct.

The italic B denotes the date.
375 is gold purity.
Lions head is London Assay office.
Thankyou for that
 
Posts
3,059
Likes
6,539
I think it will clean up very nicely with service.

BTW the buckle has the somewhat worn sun mark it is original gold plated buckle from maker MG (not sure if we know his actual name) and will fit nicely on a new leather black or brown strap after bit of cleanup.

If you’re looking for some late night browsing you can find a lot of info on Omega buckles here:

 
Posts
17
Likes
11
I think it will clean up very nicely with service.

BTW the buckle has the somewhat worn sun mark it is original gold plated buckle from maker MG (not sure if we know his actual name) and will fit nicely on a new leather black or brown strap after bit of cleanup.

If you’re looking for some late night browsing you can find a lot of info on Omega buckles here:

Thankyou for that - yes looks just like the ones in that thread marked MG. I have asked the watchmaker about putting the buckle on the new strap I am having put on it.

This thread has been great and has given me lots of info that I didn’t know about the details of the watch
 
Posts
13,713
Likes
53,531
Other option is Swiss Time Services which is well regarded.
 
Posts
17
Likes
11
So the watch is nearly on its way back to me - it was a monocoque case when it was taken apart. One curious thing is the movement doesn’t have a serial number - is this usual? It seems to be missing the stamps?

View attachment 3298677
 
Posts
17
Likes
11
Ah - so were not all movements stamped? I had seen this online - another 1010 movement but this one stamped

 
Posts
24,327
Likes
54,150
That is also a sticker with the 41 million serial number. Yours fell out.
 
Posts
18,205
Likes
27,539
English made 9k case by Shackman.
London made with date letter for 1976.
These cases were made under licence for Omega.
learn something new every day!!!
 
Posts
2,006
Likes
2,174
That is also a sticker with the 41 million serial number. Yours fell out.
The movement number(1010) is stamped on the reference but not OPs. That said, thats not anything to be worried about. While many movements were stamped with the movement number on that plate, not all were, see: https://www.emmywatch.com/db/movement/omega--1010/

That said, definitely not a 565 movement there, so guessing the title ends up not being accurate 😀 Curious why OP thought it was a 565 in the first place, and if that is meaningful in any way.
 
Posts
17
Likes
11
The movement number(1010) is stamped on the reference but not OPs. That said, thats not anything to be worried about. While many movements were stamped with the movement number on that plate, not all were, see: https://www.emmywatch.com/db/movement/omega--1010/

That said, definitely not a 565 movement there, so guessing the title ends up not being accurate 😀 Curious why OP thought it was a 565 in the first place, and if that is meaningful in any way.
Hi - I didn’t name the thread title, right at the offset before it was sent away someone renamed it with a best guess of what the watch might be to assist in any replies.
 
Posts
2,006
Likes
2,174
Hi - I didn’t name the thread title, right at the offset before it was sent away someone renamed it with a best guess of what the watch might be to assist in any replies.
Ah! Mystery solved 😀 I didn't see the rename-when I re-scanned the conversation.

Either way, it looks like an honest 1010 movement in a by-contract case. Hope it gets plenty of wrist time!
 
Posts
17
Likes
11
Ah! Mystery solved 😀 I didn't see the rename-when I re-scanned the conversation.

Either way, it looks like an honest 1010 movement in a by-contract case. Hope it gets plenty of wrist time!
Yes it will do - a happy coincidence is that my dad was presented with the watch in 1976 - it seems it’s a 1976 watch going by the case - and I was born in 1976 - I’m actually 50 in 1 weeks time (2nd January) and will likely have the watch back just in time
 
Posts
6,315
Likes
9,761
learn something new every day!!!
Most 18k gold cases (for Constellations) were made on license for Omega by Dennison in Birmingham, with only some made (for certain references) in London by Shackman.
However, Shackman took over completely in 1967 when Dennison went bust.
 
Posts
18,205
Likes
27,539
Most 18k gold cases (for Constellations) were made on license for Omega by Dennison in Birmingham, with only some made (for certain references) in London by Shackman.
However, Shackman took over completely in 1967 when Dennison went bust.

Ohh I know about Denison’s which are clearly marked as Denison’s (I own some). This one looks like Swiss cases but has English hallmarks.
 
Posts
17,969
Likes
37,559
I didn't see the rename-when I re-scanned the conversation.
It's OK.

It's been re-re-named.

😉
 
Posts
17
Likes
11
So the watch is back - and I’m really happy with it, great work by the watch guy - thanks for the advice and information on this thread.

 
Posts
10,451
Likes
16,344
This came up very well and is now fit to be treasured as an heirloom.

Ohh I know about Denison’s which are clearly marked as Denison’s (I own some). This one looks like Swiss cases but has English hallmarks.
This is clearly marked too but less obviously. OWC logically stands for Omega Watch Company but is in fact only seen on Shackman cases. Early cases are often marked DS&S but here the double S logo is used which is more a 70s thing. Another give away for a British case is the 4th digit (of 162.5422) being a 5. Other local production cases had a different digit in that location to denote country of case origin. Italy for instance used number 9 for this purpose.