The watch looks original and in age appropriate condition for a 60 year old watch. The movement photo is not particularly helpful.
Are you buying from a dealer or a private seller. In both cases, they should tell you how the watch runs and if they know when, if ever, it was serviced.
If it’s a dealer, he may be prepared to give a warranty or agree to accept the watch back in certain circumstances. You might be able to have your watch repairer check out the condition.
Whether dealer or private, you should be able to negotiate the price. See what similar watches have been sold for on eBay, send the photos to your watch repairer and a) get his view on condition and b) his estimate on service.
ALSO BE AWARE THAT THE ROTOR HAS BEEN RUBBING ON THE CASEBACK SO THAT WILL NEED TO BE ATTENDED TO AT EXTRA COST AS WELL (IF IT HASN'T ALREADY BEEN DONE).
(Damn, had CAPS on! 😡).
You can see the rubbing evidence (red arrows) and the rotor bushing / axle that needs replacement (blue arrow).
You can see the rubbing evidence (red arrows) and the rotor bushing / axle that needs replacement (blue arrow).
Not likely the axle, and most likely the pinion (bushing). Those are discontinued, and I have managed to find some on the open market. The 3rd wheel is also discontinued and often needs replacing. The mainspring is discontinued, along with a bunch of other parts.
Generally anything older than the 550 series has parts discontinued, so the 500 series are no different in that respect.
I wouldn't necessarily discourage people from buying these, but they should be aware that parts are not likely going to be as readily available as they are for newer calibers.
Just a follow up question regarding rotor rub in general:
We often see evidence of rotor rub on the inside of the back case and of course on the rotor itself. AFAIK the rotor doesn't need replacing whilst addressing this issue, just the pinion. It isn't possible from a photo to see the play in the rotor when the pinion is worn and needs replacing, but my WM has shown me that ( on numerous occasions ) when we have a watch in hand. Would I be correct to say that it also isn't possible to tell from a photo whether or not the pinion issue has been previously addressed/replaced when all I have to go at is are pictures of a rotor with rubbing and evidence of rotor rub on the case back?
Wow so much information. I think I gonna stay away from vintage. I thought it would be much easier for replacement parts. It s a nice watch but I don't want to get in "trouble" 🙁
Wow so much information. I think I gonna stay away from vintage. I thought it would be much easier for replacement parts. It s a nice watch but I don't want to get in "trouble" 🙁