A 105.003-65 SP?

Posts
731
Likes
1,630
as an avid collector of 105.003 i have been offered what is described as 1 of only 3 in existence late 1968 105.003 SP. i am waiting for some better pictures but the case back looks like a standard 105.003 caseback and stamped SP.. Yet on the EOA there is no mention of this.

I know the pictures are bad but hopefully you can see the SP looks like it has been added afterwards.

Does anyone have a 145.003 SP with EOA and if so does it mention this SP , water protection upgrade
I saw this one on eBay too. They are asking £15,000, that's $20,000 and is super overpriced in my opinion. For that money I'd want an unpolished case and nicer dial. "SP" inside the caseback adds no value to me, you won't even see it.
 
Posts
35
Likes
11
I saw this one on eBay too. They are asking £15,000, that's $20,000 and is super overpriced in my opinion. For that money I'd want an unpolished case and nicer dial. "SP" inside the caseback adds no value to me, you won't even see it.
Its 13,500 on their website. But no offers.

I said exactly the same to them and the pushers was in their opinion the big deal and made it 1 of only 3 ever made. ( yeah right)
 
Posts
1,516
Likes
4,769
as an avid collector of 105.003 i have been offered what is described as 1 of only 3 in existence late 1968 105.003 SP. i am waiting for some better pictures but the case back looks like a standard 105.003 caseback and stamped SP.. Yet on the EOA there is no mention of this.

I know the pictures are bad but hopefully you can see the SP looks like it has been added afterwards.

Does anyone have a 145.003 SP with EOA and if so does it mention this SP , water protection upgrade
All of the 003 SP watches I have seen have had upgraded pushers and the fat tail chronograph hand which is not a coincidence.
 
Posts
18,095
Likes
27,413
All of the 003 SP watches I have seen have had upgraded pushers and the fat tail chronograph hand which is not a coincidence.
All of the 003 SP watches I have seen have had upgraded pushers and the fat tail chronograph hand which is not a coincidence.
The parts they would have gotten in service?