Forums Latest Members
  1. michael e Still learning. Jan 22, 2019

    Posts
    1,501
    Likes
    4,666
    A mate of mine has just sent me a couple of photos of his 105.003, I inspected it a while ago for him and said the pushers were replacement and the chrono hand and crown too.
    I didn’t see the SP on the end of the reference.
    Could this be a late 105.003 with parts as it left the factory? Newer style crown, chrono hand and crown? Anyone else seen this reference with SP before?
    Or are these just service parts?
    Serial is 2544xxxx
    Thanks, Michael
     
    AC1771F8-0FF8-47E3-9D6E-946B6DCC6214.jpeg DFEB0B31-DDE2-43D4-9A71-F8D596F8F52D.jpeg 7083E405-2FDD-47B2-A1C8-6CD37FAF35D9.jpeg 9C791A6A-FA1C-41E2-9766-8172F02C6681.jpeg
  2. trash_gordon Jan 22, 2019

    Posts
    591
    Likes
    1,226
    Looks like they added that SP later. Maybe the replaced the old pushers with the new "SP" pushers and stamped it in backcase.
     
    watchyouwant, Foo2rama and michael e like this.
  3. OMEGuy Jan 22, 2019

    Posts
    2,086
    Likes
    2,783
    Not sure about hand and crown, but I have seen the ST 105.003-65 SP a couple of times. The movement # matches a late production, so this watch seems generally legit to me.

    I always believed these to be the 'mysterious' ref. 145.003.

    Edit: While looking for pictures, Google just found this one:

    https://forums.watchuseek.com/f20/speedmaster-meister-652125.html
     
    Edited Jan 22, 2019
    befobe, Foo2rama and michael e like this.
  4. michael e Still learning. Jan 22, 2019

    Posts
    1,501
    Likes
    4,666
    A 145.003 had crossed my mind, I am ordering the archive today so hopefully it might mention something.

    The watch in the link sounds like a twisted lug 105.012 not a 105.003 though.

    Thanks, Michael
     
    Edited Jan 22, 2019
  5. OMEGuy Jan 22, 2019

    Posts
    2,086
    Likes
    2,783
    Yes, correct. I didn't read the whole description of this ebay auction from 2012 and it's obviously all a bit weird if you do... One would have to see the pics.

    Anyway, I confirm to have seen the ST 105.003-65 with the 'SP' in the past.
     
  6. Delbok Jan 23, 2019

    Posts
    499
    Likes
    809
    Stop me if I am wrong but these pushers look like the Wide & Tall from MWO, these pushers are not supposed to be fitted on a straight lug case, so definitely a later replacement (and so for the crown) but the case might have been damaged to be able to receive these pushers...
    I had the case on a franken speedy I bought for some parts and fortunately my watchmaker has been able to fix the case to receive correct pushers for a straight lug case
    About the hand the chrono one is a later replacement but hour & minute look correct to me
     
    watchyouwant likes this.
  7. OMEGuy Jan 23, 2019

    Posts
    2,086
    Likes
    2,783
    No need to stop you, since you're right. :)

    But the OP stated already that the pushers are replacements.

    The question was, if a 1967 105.003-65 might have had a different crown and sweep second from factory, as can be found on ref. 145.012-67.
     
  8. stefman Jan 23, 2019

    Posts
    384
    Likes
    686
    SP = Service Parts ;)



    Edit to make sure it’s clear it's tongue in cheek
     
  9. michael e Still learning. Jan 23, 2019

    Posts
    1,501
    Likes
    4,666
    Here is what I am hoping.
    145.003[​IMG]Credit to @SpikiSpikester for the above photo.

    And @Spacefruit for this>
    SP = speciale poussoirs

    "Special pushers"

    Upgraded for better water resistance
     
    Edited Jan 23, 2019
    befobe, Mad Dog, merchandiser and 6 others like this.
  10. OMEGuy Jan 23, 2019

    Posts
    2,086
    Likes
    2,783
    143.003? ::confused2::

    Typing mistake.
     
    Edited Jan 23, 2019
  11. simonsays Jan 23, 2019

    Posts
    1,344
    Likes
    1,902

    Which publication has this come from?
     
  12. michael e Still learning. Jan 23, 2019

    Posts
    1,501
    Likes
    4,666
    It is the tables in the back of A Journey Through Time
     
  13. michael e Still learning. Jan 23, 2019

    Posts
    1,501
    Likes
    4,666
  14. simonsays Jan 23, 2019

    Posts
    1,344
    Likes
    1,902
    Thanks, I though it looked familiar but couldn’t find it. That is standard for anything in JTT, for me anyway.
     
  15. simonsays Jan 23, 2019

    Posts
    1,344
    Likes
    1,902
    I don’t think Special pushers is correct. There are plenty of cases marked SP with no pushers. Special referring to water resistance makes sense though
     
    michael e and wsfarrell like this.
  16. oddboy Zero to Grail+2998 In Six Months Jan 23, 2019

    Posts
    9,217
    Likes
    23,880
    Fwiw, am extract won't specify 145.003. I have one, and though interaction with the museum , they confirmed that it would have been referred to internally as a 145.003, but the reference is still 105.003. They said specifically that 145.003 was an internal logistics designation only and was not a reference itself.

    I can dig out the conversation, but it's all via email. Before I knew that, I ordered an extract hoping to see 145.003 on there, and even went back to them when the extract arrived indicating 105.003.

    Interesting case though .
     
  17. wsfarrell Jan 23, 2019

    Posts
    2,441
    Likes
    4,133
    Indeed. And if it were French, it would be "poussoirs speciale," not "speciale poussoirs."
     
  18. airansun In the shuffling madness Jan 23, 2019

    Posts
    2,520
    Likes
    17,674
    @oddboy :
    Serial number, pretty please!
     
  19. oddboy Zero to Grail+2998 In Six Months Jan 23, 2019

    Posts
    9,217
    Likes
    23,880
    25,441,xxx
     
  20. airansun In the shuffling madness Jan 23, 2019

    Posts
    2,520
    Likes
    17,674
    So, my 25441067 Ed is also a 145.003? ::psy::

    A9A474C6-5282-4953-B33A-3D11F7C997F2.jpeg

    I’d be interested in the email, obviously.

    C90E6F48-9665-433E-BCA5-6CA7F24E82DC.jpeg

    What date does your extract show for yours?