Hi guys, I posted over on rolex forum, but wanted some more eyes to assess this nice 5513 Looking at other similar serial pieces the dial looks correct and in good condition, but would like some other eyes to have a look! **There is some small lume loss on the 9 marker** Serial is 1.1xxxxxx. Case looks thick, chamfers look original?. Bezel I believe is correct, but not an expert on these. Unfortunately no caseback/movement photos. Seller states triple lock crown and plexi changed last service some years ago. Comes on a 65 7206/80. I'd would normally make an interstate trip to view in person, but this Covid business has put a hold on that. Cheers!
Spectacular watch. That is known as a long-5 insert, I believe. That might help you figure out if it's period-correct. Is it too soon to say "dibs".
Looks like a great Sub to me. The 1.1 serial would be consistent with a 1965 Sub, and of course that is consistent with a gilt dial (1962-1966). The stamp on the clasp also indicates a 1965 date. The Triplock crown was used on Subs, and the three dots below the coronet are the same size, which is consistent with a stainless steel Rolex. The insert I believe is correct. The example you are considering looks very similar to the one featured on Hodinkee's Reference Points: https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/rolex-submariner-reference-points I'd be curious what the consensus was on Rolex Forum...
Nice watch may have had a twin-lock from factory? Tritium mirror gloss dial, chamfers, mark two insert and deep groove bezel and those gorgeous gilt hands. M
Looks very nice! Cosmetically I think just the crown and crystal are service replacements and not period correct. The crown can be pretty easily found. I believe 1.1 would be most correct with a high super dome t19 but that may be more difficult to find.
Looks like a beauty. Those watches are amazing in the flesh. Crown guard looks a little over polished while edges look perfectly cut? Get a movement shot and confirm Caseback is proper (date stamp).