1927 Omega Chronometer Pocket Watch

Posts
12,664
Likes
17,108
The watch is special enough that I will copy a couple of the photos over:



I don’t know much about this watch other than it has a very high grade chronometer movement.

gatorcpa
 
Posts
8
Likes
4
Thanks, sorry I was going to post pics and then it asked for a url! I will do better next time I promise! ☺️
 
Posts
8
Likes
4
Im actually a wristwatch man myself but my father collects pocket watches so I have searches saved on eBay as it’s the best thing to get him for birthdays and Christmas , he doesn’t appreciate socks or shaving stuff

I wouldn’t know if it was rare or not, I just know I never seen one with hands like that and thought I’d check if it was rarity
 
Posts
1,579
Likes
15,221
Thanks for posting it! I don't often go to the eBay, so wouldn't have stumbled on that.
 
Posts
8
Likes
4
That has to be the same watch!

note the hands differ in the publication pic
 
Posts
14,395
Likes
41,481
The subject Omega is marked as “adjusted to 6 positions”. The dial is marked “Chronometre (sic)”. It has a bi-metallic, temperature compensating balance wheel, Breguet hairspring, cam-type micrometer regulator. It has most of what would be considered as railroad standard, but I doubt the fancy “Omega” hands would have been acceptable. And it is not lever set. I checked the time service rules for many American railroads. Omega is not listed as having been approved for railroad use on U S railroads, according to the tables I read. However, it is possible that a railroad, somewhere, might have accepted that one. The case on the Omega is .375 (9-karat gold), and is by Dennison, an English company. So it would appear as though the subject Omega was meant for the domestic market in Britain where it might have been railroad approved.

According to the time service rules for the CPR in Canada as in effect from 1899 to 1910, Brandt-Omega grade CCR (16-size, 19-jewels), CCCR (16-size, 23-jewels), DDR (18-size, 19-jewels), and DDDR (18-size, 23-jewels) were accepted. The subject is not any one of those. I’ve shown a Brandt, 16-size, 19-jewel, grade CCR, just for comparison. It was railroad approved in Canada.

Among the notable differences between the subject Omega and the Brandt (aside from the difference in jewel count) is the fact that the Brandt has a jewelled safety barrel, and it is lever set. The Omega has a 5xxxxxxx, so it is circa 1916, and the Brandt has a 2xxxxxx serial number which is circa 1905.

Maybe this will help you decide whether to buy it, or walk.

 
Posts
8
Likes
4
That’s interesting, so it could be approx 10 years old than the case it sits in?
 
Posts
1,579
Likes
15,221
Except, the watch in the link is in a hunter case, and the hands are different.

I'm afraid you are mistaken, sir. The OPs link to the eBay listing has the Omega hands and is an open face watch. The thread where this has already been discussed starts with photo of the very same watch, followed by a picture from a book of a similar watch.
 
Posts
14,395
Likes
41,481
I'm afraid you are mistaken, sir. The OPs link to the eBay listing has the Omega hands and is an open face watch. The thread where this has already been discussed starts with photo of the very same watch, followed by a picture from a book of a similar watch.

You’re right. I was looking at one of the other watches.
 
Posts
14,395
Likes
41,481
That’s interesting, so it could be approx 10 years old than the case it sits in?

The picture showing the inside case back where the hallmark and date letter are shown is terrible. If that is an upper case C, it could be 1927 or 1928. But if it is a lower case c, then it could be 1902 or 1903. Another consideration might be, is that case original to the movement?

The serial #/date references generally available are only estimates. The one I just checked lists a 5 million serial number as being 1916, and a 6 million serial number as being 1923. So who is to know wherein lie the facts of the matter? The subject Omega appears to have been made somewhere between 1916 and 1923! That still doesn’t explain the case which appears to be later than 1923. Take out of it all what you will.
 
Posts
16,531
Likes
34,797
The Birmingham hallmark is for 1927/1928. It ties in with the date range shown in AJTT. The movement may be older but that's not unusual with special or high grade movements.

 
Posts
8
Likes
4
What do you guys think it will make? It’s got about 5 days to go and it’s up to 670, I’m very tempted it’s a great looking watch, think my father would love it, but can’t even ask his advice as it would be his Xmas present