Community Stories

168.023 Original Dial?

ConElPueblo
Posts
9,588
Likes
27,697
Archer Archer
The inside of the case back had no reference number inside - not even 100% sure what is genuine on this one.

Omega doesn't classify it a chronometer movement now, but they did then.

That's really interesting!
 
Sign up or log in to reply...

Similar threads

M

Constellation 168.005 - original dial ?

MJR Vintage Omega Watches Help, Discussion and Advice
M
MJR
Posts
16
Views
416
Sumpf100

Another 168.005… original dial?

Sumpf100 Vintage Omega Watches Help, Discussion and Advice
Peemacgee
Peemacgee
Posts
7
Views
345
T

Omega Constellation 168.010: Redial or Original Dial?

time-after-time Vintage Omega Watches Help, Discussion and Advice
TIMElyBehaviour
TIMElyBehaviour
Posts
7
Views
407
robertmei

1954 Omega Seamaster Bumper: Original Dial or Redial?

robertmei Vintage Omega Watches Help, Discussion and Advice
JimInOz
JimInOz
Posts
4
Views
189
M

Vintage Omega De Ville Ladies: Original Dial or Redial?

masmith Vintage Omega Watches Help, Discussion and Advice
Dan S
Dan S
Posts
3
Views
197
C

Omega Triple Calendar: Original Dial or Redone?

Codytza444 Vintage Omega Watches Help, Discussion and Advice
M
myatt
Posts
6
Views
260