Omega Constellation 168.005 Pie Pan: Original Dial?

Posts
25
Likes
12
I'm a newbie, but this dial of a 168.005 looks original, am I right?
(I see the crown is wrong.)

 
Posts
6,588
Likes
10,171
That’s because it’s not a dogleg.

Not all pie pans are doglegs…..
 
Posts
6,588
Likes
10,171
It’s either an .004 or .010.
Due to the two tone dial probably the former.

Dial looks correct but marked.
This reference would originally have had a hidden crown - but they are no longer available - this Crown is one of the options for a replacement crown.
 
Posts
491
Likes
813
It’s either an .004 or .010.
Due to the two tone dial probably the former.

Dial looks correct but marked.
This reference would originally have had a hidden crown - but they are no longer available - this Crown is one of the options for a replacement crown.
It seems to me that one of the indicators of a redial some "experts" often cite is that the minute slashes are inconsistent, some being closer to the Pie-Pan ?facet? than others. The OP's is an example: note the difference between the 12 to 2 marks vs those from 5 to 7. But I have seen this other times with dials the true experts (such as you) have blessed as original.
I think this is just a slight imperfection, but in the absence of other red flags it alone does not indicate the dial has been re-painted. Your thoughts?
 
Posts
6,588
Likes
10,171
I see what you say about the minute haches at the top and the bottom of the dial.

The haches on these hidden crown Constellations pie pan dials are usually noticeably closer to the pie pan edge than on other pie pans.

The ones at the bottom do drift away from the edge on this example.
However, the rest of the dial and script look correct (although better images would help) so I think in this instance it's a conformity issue rather than a sign of a redial.
 
Posts
491
Likes
813
I see what you say about the minute haches at the top and the bottom of the dial.

The haches on these hidden crown Constellations pie pan dials are usually noticeably closer to the pie pan edge than on other pie pans.

The ones at the bottom do drift away from the edge on this example.
However, the rest of the dial and script look correct (although better images would help) so I think in this instance it's a conformity issue rather than a sign of a redial.
Thanks for the reply. Is this something you have noticed on other original dials?
 
Posts
6,588
Likes
10,171
I have an .010 pie pan that drifts very slightly around the 2-5 area whereas the rest of the haches are pretty much hard up against the pie pan edge.
Not as pronounced as the OPs example though.