ChrisN
·Over in this thread, @tamura gave a link to some replacement bracelet springs from Urdelar in Sweden and I said I'd give them a try. These are €12 each so I just bought three at €40 including P&P, to see if they are any good.
They arrived within a few days from Sweden (to UK). I've dealt with Urdelar before and they are good guys but that's always been for some obscure part for a watch. Here's a link from my -69 and I'm fortunate that I have a lot of links and don't need them all. The lower spring seems to be an Omega original and the upper some sort of very weak replacement. There are already threads on here about how to remove these links from the bracelet if you want to do this.
I opened this link up as this is the only way to remove an original spring - well, it might be possible to wrench it out but I wouldn't recommend it. If you can get two new springs in without opening an end then I'd suspect they wouldn't be stiff enough for use.
The Urdelar spring is similar to the Omega one although the finish is not as good - bear in mind these are hand made. Dimensions in mm are:
Omega: 1.00 high by 0.23 thick (sample size of 1...)
Urdelar: 1.20-1.25 high by 0.20 thick (sample size of 3)
They will be a similar stiffness if the material/shape is the same as the inertia of the Omega one will be about 25% higher than the Urdelar one (thickness has a cubed effect here). Testing by hand, the Omega one is a little stiffer and there may also be a little bit of age hardening of the material - anyway, the Urdelar one should be fine as it's close enough and better than the one shown with a ? in the picture which doesn't even seem to be spring steel.
Fitted and the original is on the right below - it's clear that the finish is not as good on the new spring but, I could polish this if I wanted two - at least the two springs meet as they should. This is actually the first one I did and then posed the photos above with another - I started with this one as the link was slightly damaged on one leg. The end that I opened is at the top and, if you're going to do this, when closing that end you must support underneath it. If you're careful the link will still look fine and you'll have a bracelet that works as it should.
As a disclaimer, I'm obviously used to working on parts much smaller than this as I'm a watchmaker but, these are not so small that I would think this work is beyond someone who has good DIY skills and works carefully.
I'd also bear in mind that these are big pictures and the springs are only about 12 mm (half an inch) wide so, where the finish and shape are not as good as the original, you're getting a very magnified effect. I'd be happy with these on my bracelet as I don't have any other source (anyone?). I originally thought about getting some made but am not sure it would be worth the effort so, will order up another eight as that's how many I'm likely to need. To do the whole bracelet would mean buying about 20 more at €250 total so I'll keep the ones that are fine...
Cheers, Chris
They arrived within a few days from Sweden (to UK). I've dealt with Urdelar before and they are good guys but that's always been for some obscure part for a watch. Here's a link from my -69 and I'm fortunate that I have a lot of links and don't need them all. The lower spring seems to be an Omega original and the upper some sort of very weak replacement. There are already threads on here about how to remove these links from the bracelet if you want to do this.
I opened this link up as this is the only way to remove an original spring - well, it might be possible to wrench it out but I wouldn't recommend it. If you can get two new springs in without opening an end then I'd suspect they wouldn't be stiff enough for use.
The Urdelar spring is similar to the Omega one although the finish is not as good - bear in mind these are hand made. Dimensions in mm are:
Omega: 1.00 high by 0.23 thick (sample size of 1...)
Urdelar: 1.20-1.25 high by 0.20 thick (sample size of 3)
They will be a similar stiffness if the material/shape is the same as the inertia of the Omega one will be about 25% higher than the Urdelar one (thickness has a cubed effect here). Testing by hand, the Omega one is a little stiffer and there may also be a little bit of age hardening of the material - anyway, the Urdelar one should be fine as it's close enough and better than the one shown with a ? in the picture which doesn't even seem to be spring steel.
Fitted and the original is on the right below - it's clear that the finish is not as good on the new spring but, I could polish this if I wanted two - at least the two springs meet as they should. This is actually the first one I did and then posed the photos above with another - I started with this one as the link was slightly damaged on one leg. The end that I opened is at the top and, if you're going to do this, when closing that end you must support underneath it. If you're careful the link will still look fine and you'll have a bracelet that works as it should.
As a disclaimer, I'm obviously used to working on parts much smaller than this as I'm a watchmaker but, these are not so small that I would think this work is beyond someone who has good DIY skills and works carefully.
I'd also bear in mind that these are big pictures and the springs are only about 12 mm (half an inch) wide so, where the finish and shape are not as good as the original, you're getting a very magnified effect. I'd be happy with these on my bracelet as I don't have any other source (anyone?). I originally thought about getting some made but am not sure it would be worth the effort so, will order up another eight as that's how many I'm likely to need. To do the whole bracelet would mean buying about 20 more at €250 total so I'll keep the ones that are fine...
Cheers, Chris