Your opinion on an Omega dial please

Posts
411
Likes
626
Hi

Found in a local website the followed Constellation Omega with 'shark teeth' indices. I am not interested in buying but out of curiosity would like to know what you think about its dial conditions.

To me overall appearance of dial (lacquer, ink print, etc...) is not consistent with signs of wear on case. By the way font type although convincing but to my neophyte eyes seems uneven in regard with height and the lack of ink emboss.
 
Posts
4,823
Likes
12,211
I'm not seeing any pictures. Edit: I see it now, and agree looks like a redial. In addition to your observations, the boundary of the minute track is wonky.
Edited:
 
Posts
241
Likes
326
Not sure if it is just the angle of the photo. But the alignment of the cross hair looks strange:



The printing also looks a bit heavy.
Edited:
 
Posts
1,458
Likes
2,059
Redial. Just the alignment of the minute track alone is enough to suggest this.
 
Posts
325
Likes
165
And to me, cross hair thickness must that of an elephant, not that of a swiss mousse !
 
Posts
325
Likes
165
And irregular spacing between the "Swiss Made" letters... would my 3 years old grand child have done better ?
 
Posts
3,410
Likes
13,210
Definitely a redial and the issues don’t stop there. Avoid…
 
Posts
411
Likes
626
Tks all
An other pic with better focusing hoping it shows lack of emboss on dial.

 
Posts
260
Likes
672
This is a redialed, font size of “Automatic” appear to be larger than the rest. Crosshair too thick.
 
Posts
311
Likes
185
I am not an expert in the "art" of spotting redials and i try to learn this but for this one there were many signs to sugest the redial. Thank you.
 
Posts
26
Likes
16
It's a re-dial with incorrect hands... I guess the important thing is to be warned and, if you like it, pay the right price... IMO