Would you trade...

Posts
63
Likes
3
... the below JLC Master Control Moonphase for a new Polar? If so, why?

https://www.chrono24.com/jaegerlecou...id29320945.htm

Current collection includes:

-TT CHNR
-VTNR
-Polar
-Seamaster 300M 2254.50
-Vintage Breitling Top Time 810 Panda
-Vintage IWC cal 89 in SS
-Vintage Omega Seamaster from 1961 w/ linen dial gold capped
-Vintage Vacheron & Constantin 6378 in YG

 
Posts
1,367
Likes
835
not really? you have a very balanced collection atm if anything a litle gmt heavy and vintage dress heavy, also im biased towards the old polar any way, huge fan. Id add the jlc
 
Posts
652
Likes
742
I like the JLC better than the Polar. It's a much more interesting watch imo
 
Posts
4,914
Likes
17,133
Get the JLC (and a strap for the VC 😁)
 
Posts
3,110
Likes
20,357
I'd keep it and the vintage polar, if it were my collection. I prefer the older polar and you've already got 2 of the larger, more recent Rolex GMTs.
 
Posts
12,895
Likes
51,593
As an owner of a RG MCMP … I’d vote JLC.
 
Posts
964
Likes
2,324
Whoa. Your original proposed trade was kind of meh in my opinion. I’m a big JLC fan, but I already have a Reverso Duo. So personally, I would rather have the Polar over the Master Control Moonphase.

But that 18k triple date Reverso could launch a dozen ships. I vote you made one heck of a trade.
 
Posts
11
Likes
7
Looks like the JLC is gone. JLC is a level up so I will definitely consider.
 
Posts
63
Likes
3
Update to my Update... The deal for the above JLC fell through so I made a trade for a Mint 2016 Rose Gold JLC Reverso 976 and $2500 usd cash my way and sending away my Exp. II Polar. Very hard decision, but just felt it was too good of a deal to pass up.