Would this bother you? Service Centre experience.

Posts
530
Likes
895
If they scratch the dial they should put a new one in. Had a slightly skewed index on a meteorite side of the moon and they changed no quibbles (and again as I didn't like the pattern of the new one).
 
Posts
530
Likes
895
I'd write to headquarters if they refuse. Pretty clear you didn't do this and it is either the service center or a QA issue.
I simply politely pointed out that this is inferior quality and the OB in London Regent Street obliged. They also changed the case on my white gold moon phase which they scratched and then polished badly. I do have some purchase history but this shouldn't make a difference.
 
Posts
728
Likes
2,174
They can absolutely do it. Their margins are not so slim that they have to give you damaged goods or else go hungry.
 
Posts
228
Likes
214
UPDATE POST

Omega agreed to replace my dial (and hands) due to the scratches the last technician left behind. Here's the new look:
However, the saga unfortunately continues...

Dust on the new dial:
Hour hand misalignment (2 minutes):
Also noticed the printing looks less sharp than my old dial (e.g. letter "H" here), however, I'm not too bothered by this:

Though not ideal, I realize these aren't major issues. I'll definitely continue enjoying the watch but thought I'd update to give Omega credit for the dial replacement. What do you guys think?
 
Posts
728
Likes
2,174
Totally ridiculous, but small issues. People will try to get away with anything they think is a small enough sin. Replacement with something of equal quality is a long lost standard.
 
Posts
228
Likes
214
Totally ridiculous, but small issues. People will try to get away with anything they think is a small enough sin. Replacement with something of equal quality is a long lost standard.
It’s unfortunate. It’s either that I need to manage expectations or come to terms with being really unlucky. Every intervention has birthed a slew of new problems.
 
Posts
7,519
Likes
13,895
Dust, hair and other things are always a potential problem when opened up for an intervention.
 
Posts
1,087
Likes
1,163
Dust, hair and other things are always a potential problem when opened up for an intervention.
It honestly shouldn't be a risk when dealing with a big service center like Omega/Rolex/etc.

Getting low-dust rooms is pretty manageable, and controlling what comes in helps too.

After that, I would expect a good level of inspection at the workbench afterwards.

A watch going back a 2nd time to fix what they ruined is unacceptable, let alone a 3rd+ time.
 
Posts
7,519
Likes
13,895
It honestly shouldn't be a risk when dealing with a big service center like Omega/Rolex/etc.

Getting low-dust rooms is pretty manageable, and controlling what comes in helps too.

After that, I would expect a good level of inspection at the workbench afterwards.

A watch going back a 2nd time to fix what they ruined is unacceptable, let alone a 3rd+ time.
I don't disagree that this stuff shouldn't happen, just that real world repair facilities aren't generally as clean, and as much care taken, as a factory, although stuff can happen there, too. It's always a weigh between getting a 'problem' fixed, or just living with it until the watch needs a full service in the future. That's why I don't get excited about a slightly out of position hand or a fleck of dust. If the watch doesn't run as designed then it needs fixin', but cosmetic stuff I'll generally overlook. I don't overly loupe my watches.
 
Posts
228
Likes
214
I don't disagree that this stuff shouldn't happen, just that real world repair facilities aren't generally as clean, and as much care taken, as a factory, although stuff can happen there, too. It's always a weigh between getting a 'problem' fixed, or just living with it until the watch needs a full service in the future. That's why I don't get excited about a slightly out of position hand or a fleck of dust. If the watch doesn't run as designed then it needs fixin', but cosmetic stuff I'll generally overlook. I don't overly loupe my watches.
Generally, I agree. However, if you read the thread here I took this watch in for waterproof testing (under warranty). The technician working on the watch decided to clean the dial citing “dust”. That’s what caused all the cosmetic issues and the subsequent trips to the service center.
 
Posts
243
Likes
380
Honestly, this shouldn't happen. First, the service team made mistakes and then QC (if any!) didn't pick it up. It wouldn't leave my bench like this.
 
Posts
870
Likes
893
The dust under the crystal is unacceptable. I'm sure the hands are within tolerance though.
 
Posts
60
Likes
44
UPDATE POST

Omega agreed to replace my dial (and hands) due to the scratches the last technician left behind. Here's the new look:
However, the saga unfortunately continues...

Dust on the new dial:
Hour hand misalignment (2 minutes):
Also noticed the printing looks less sharp than my old dial (e.g. letter "H" here), however, I'm not too bothered by this:

Though not ideal, I realize these aren't major issues. I'll definitely continue enjoying the watch but thought I'd update to give Omega credit for the dial replacement. What do you guys think?
Great update, just a shame it took so long for Omega to 'fess up and do the right thing. Happy for you, enjoy your watch!
 
Posts
228
Likes
214
The dust under the crystal is unacceptable. I'm sure the hands are within tolerance though.
I’ve heard anecdotally that the tolerance is +/- 2 minutes.

Anything more than a couple minutes really bothers me. Partly because it’s sloppy work (any amateur watchmaker should know how to align hands, then check them across indices). Also given a watch’s main function is to tell time, if my watch is on minute two and the hour hand is still in the previous hour… kind of defeats the whole purpose.
 
Posts
29,111
Likes
75,238
I’ve heard anecdotally that the tolerance is +/- 2 minutes.
From Omega Work Instruction 43, which covers dial and hands:

"The tolerance of the synchronization between the hour and minute hand is +/- 2 minutes at the 12 o’clock position."
 
Posts
5,979
Likes
20,530
I don't overly loupe my watches.
This should be in the Learn to Fish thread.

I'm generally pretty happy with my watches and try to wear them all. But when I take a photo for WRUW or just in general, all those bruises jump out. "Where the #@$ did those scratches come from?"

We should expect higher level of finishing and tolerances as these watches get more expensive. The 'H' above is disappointing. But if I can't see it without a loupe, it's a pass for me.


Hour hand misalignment (2 minutes):
This hour hand doesn't look misaligned to me. Pretty clear it's 12:02.
 
Posts
228
Likes
214
We should expect higher level of finishing and tolerances as these watches get more expensive. The 'H' above is disappointing. But if I can't see it without a loupe, it's a pass for me.

This hour hand doesn't look misaligned to me. Pretty clear it's 12:02.
Regarding the “H”, the printing on this new dial is just more crude. It just looks less sharp than the original 2022 dial in the watch. For example, the over-inking on top the 12 index:

I realize the white ink is probably stamped on to the dial so over-inking like this could happen. I’m honestly not too bothered by this.

As to the hour hand misalignment, it’s definitely misaligned by exactly two minutes. In the picture above, the hour hand is perfectly centered at the index, and the minute hand reads 2. When the minute hand is centered at the index, the hour hand lags just slightly—indicating a misalignment.
 
Posts
870
Likes
893
Regarding the “H”, the printing on this new dial is just more crude. It just looks less sharp than the original 2022 dial in the watch. For example, the over-inking on top the 12 index:

I realize the white ink is probably stamped on to the dial so over-inking like this could happen. I’m honestly not too bothered by this.

As to the hour hand misalignment, it’s definitely misaligned by exactly two minutes. In the picture above, the hour hand is perfectly centered at the index, and the minute hand reads 2. When the minute hand is centered at the index, the hour hand lags just slightly—indicating a misalignment.

I think if you louped 100 Rolexes you would find similar dial printing.

Personally, I do not loupe my watches or take high resolution macro shots of them. If I can't see it with the naked eye I don't need to worry about it.
 
Posts
228
Likes
214
I think if you louped 100 Rolexes you would find similar dial printing.

Personally, I do not loupe my watches or take high resolution macro shots of them. If I can't see it with the naked eye I don't need to worry about it.
Possibly. I’m sure QC issues and damage during service happens across the board. That’s not the point of this post though.

Macro shots are fun. The brands sure love doing it:

Speedmasters used to come with loupes too. This is a now discontinued practice, I’ve been told.
 
Posts
10
Likes
15
I’ve heard anecdotally that the tolerance is +/- 2 minutes.

Also given a watch’s main function is to tell time, if my watch is on minute two and the hour hand is still in the previous hour… kind of defeats the whole purpose.
Really? You think you might look at the watch and say hey - its 2 minutes past something not 12? Still very fit for purpose.