Why we are happy when a watch stays in the OF family

Posts
444
Likes
751
Only because something is *not illegal* (i.e. buy from OF, resell at eBay/etc) doesn't mean it is morally correct.

I personally consider it morally despicable someone buying from an OF member and reselling for profit (i.e. flipping watches only for profit).
Edited:
 
Posts
16,307
Likes
44,994
Morals and ethics are different that fake virtues.
Speaking from my perspective @oinkitt - if someone wants to buy low and sell high, that’s free market- we have all done that. It’s the deceptive practices which is the real issue that I feel is being discussed here. As posted in my example of the person who played on my sympathies with a fake story of poverty and family nostalgia- I felt abused when I realized he was taking advantage of my kindness to make a profit. If he had been upfront and said- “hey, I buy this broken stuff and flip it on eBay- will you cut me a deal if I bring you several pieces to repair and prep for sale”- I probably would have been happy to do it, and given him a discount...and we would have probably continued to do business happily. But it was the lie that got me...the story the deception.
 
Posts
1,071
Likes
2,167
Morals and ethics are different that fake virtues.
Just curious, but what are you hoping to accomplish with your line of comments? Are you genuinely hoping to convince people that they're wrong for feeling burned by buyers who have misrepresented themselves? Because I really don't see that happening with the way you're approaching it. Maybe you like seeing other people feeling hurt, in which case I'd ask that you just move along and find another forum to troll. I get the feeling that you'd feel more at home at https://reddit.com/r/RoastMe/.
 
Posts
1,301
Likes
2,575
Getting back to what happened to the OP, so.... he sold the watch at a forum collector price instead of trying to squeeze the last drop from the lemon. The buyer presented as a collector and the OP checked on him. A google search on the buyer last night came up with someone who matches who has a job; not 100% certain it's the same person but probable. The OP told the buyer he'd be willing to buy back the watch if he ever wanted to sell it and the buyer agreed, not something a dealer would entertain. So, on face value he's not a dealer. Like 10's of millions of others, possibly the buyer's financial situation is affected by COVID business shutdowns and job losses and he needs to sell the watch. A way for both sides to come out of this positively is for him to sell it to the OP at a price that works for both sides, or they agree to sell it on C24 and share the profits. This way nobody is left bruised and reputations are preserved.
 
Posts
422
Likes
882
Just curious, but what are you hoping to accomplish with your line of comments? Are you genuinely hoping to convince people that they're wrong for feeling burned by buyers who have misrepresented themselves? Because I really don't see that happening with the way you're approaching it. Maybe you like seeing other people feeling hurt, in which case I'd ask that you just move along and find another forum to troll. I get the feeling that you'd feel more at home at https://reddit.com/r/RoastMe/.

I don't care how other people feel. As I have said, I have never even looked at the items for sale never mind purchased anything on this forum.

I'm not trying to convince anyone. I'm just pointing out how pathetic the people are who are bitching about this. It's childish in the extreme and they need to grow up!!
 
Posts
422
Likes
882
Speaking from my perspective @oinkitt - if someone wants to buy low and sell high, that’s free market- we have all done that. It’s the deceptive practices which is the real issue that I feel is being discussed here. As posted in my example of the person who played on my sympathies with a fake story of poverty and family nostalgia- I felt abused when I realized he was taking advantage of my kindness to make a profit. If he had been upfront and said- “hey, I buy this broken stuff and flip it on eBay- will you cut me a deal if I bring you several pieces to repair and prep for sale”- I probably would have been happy to do it, and given him a discount...and we would have probably continued to do business happily. But it was the lie that got me...the story the deception.

Neither the OP or the owner ever said anything about deception.

It's your fault that you allowed someone to play you. You let it happen and now you want to complain about it.

I suspect it has happened to most of us. Best to learn from the experience and move on.
Edited:
 
Posts
422
Likes
882
Only because something is *not illegal* (i.e. buy from OF, resell at eBay/etc) doesn't mean it is morally correct.

I personally consider it morally despicable someone buying from an OF member and reselling for profit (i.e. flipping watches only for profit).

I hear what you are saying comrade!!!

I guess you would consider me despicable for disagreeing with you.

I generally only despise people who rape or murder and the like.

I trust you NEVER do anything for profit!!!
 
Posts
5,071
Likes
15,650
Back on topic : depends on the watch, and depends on the ‘family’ members. Most examples I see are between early members from a time when there were hardly any members here (and none of the WUS/TRF type content/mentality, which has escalated in my short time of membership ), and it was thus easier to get to know one another. As such I have no affiliation with them (not for lack of wanting) other than knowing ‘long time member’. I also would happily have a special watch go to such members (or ones that I have been fortunate enough to get to know) and vice versa. But again, that depends on the watch and the member.

For the most part, my last few watch sales have gone to 0 post/feedback new members joined just for the watch. One or two turned out to be nice folk...the rest strange. One watch got sold to a ‘family member’ who is (now to me) a well known dealer (and one I will avoid in future, not that I have any problem with knowledgeable dealers who are also collectors and give back)...two weeks later it was listed for double on his website, and the c🤬r did also try to lowball me (I use profanity as conversation with said person, once true colors came out, proved him to be just that). Now capitalism yadda yadda do what you want with your property fishpaste, I will not knowingly sell to such people, family or not...my property, my choice 😉 Unless I respected them as collectors.

One special watch went to a great member who I admire as a person and will go out of my way to meet up with next time I am in his neck of the woods. It’s great when that happens, and so, to nip a long story in the bud, for that sake would gladly keep them all in the family if it meant getting to better know and grow the family.
 
Posts
2,808
Likes
8,339
That story with your son is heartbreaking. My dad has an Explorer II that he inherited from his dad before him (never worn by my Grandad as he thought it was too flash for a Vacum cleaner Salesman and son of a bricklayer). I dread the idea that that would be flipped by some profit seeker.

The Speedmaster from his birth year sounds like a beautiful present though. It's the story you tell along with the watch that really adds value. I can imagine that he will treasure it.

It's funny, but after the Coke GMT went away, I was planning to give him an Explorer II instead, but I ended up selling all 3 of them to help pay for his college tuition. He was very understanding about that. I then was going to give him my Grey Side of the Moon, but he thought those were too big, and really likes my Moonwatches more. So I'm pretty sure he will love the 3572.50 with its hesalite crystal and sapphire display back - he really likes mine. It's from the late 90's with luminova, so it will have functional lume and it's keeping great time. I had it serviced a couple of months ago to have it ready in time for graduation. Likewise, he does really like my gold capped vintage Seamaster - it's being serviced right now, so I can give it to him in 2 weeks when he graduates, and the 35mm case will fit his slightly smaller wrist better than mine.
 
Posts
7,904
Likes
35,856
I think a lot of buyers with 0 posts are burner accounts of dealers, flippers and the suchlike.

I too have sold to 0 post buyers and my experience regarding communication with them has been mixed, although I must say I've never seen anything I've sold quickly for sale elsewhere....I guess my pricing was spot on 😉

If I sell a watch here I do prefer to sell to a reasonably well established member who has at least an understanding of what I'd call 'OF etiquette' which is generally lacking in someone with 0 posts to their name and there have been occasions where I've pulled the plug on a 0 post 'buyer' due to odd communication.
Edited:
 
Posts
2,808
Likes
8,339
Getting back to what happened to the OP, so.... he sold the watch at a forum collector price instead of trying to squeeze the last drop from the lemon. The buyer presented as a collector and the OP checked on him. A google search on the buyer last night came up with someone who matches who has a job; not 100% certain it's the same person but probable. The OP told the buyer he'd be willing to buy back the watch if he ever wanted to sell it and the buyer agreed, not something a dealer would entertain. So, on face value he's not a dealer. Like 10's of millions of others, possibly the buyer's financial situation is affected by COVID business shutdowns and job losses and he needs to sell the watch. A way for both sides to come out of this positively is for him to sell it to the OP at a price that works for both sides, or they agree to sell it on C24 and share the profits. This way nobody is left bruised and reputations are preserved.

But the buyer did not offer the watch to the original seller and chose to post it online for sale at double the cost. So, he's a dealer, or a liar, or both. But, if I recall the story correctly, the OP offered to buy the watch back if the buyer wasn't happy with it AFTER he saw it for sale online - but the new owner didn't take him up on the offer because it's all about the money.
 
Posts
1,650
Likes
5,222
But the buyer did not offer the watch to the original seller and chose to post it online for sale at double the cost. So, he's a dealer, or a liar, or both. But, if I recall the story correctly, the OP offered to buy the watch back if the buyer wasn't happy with it AFTER he saw it for sale online - but the new owner didn't take him up on the offer because it's all about the money.
I really dont know what his motivation is. But i guess he is planning to keep the watch, unless somebody makes him an offer he cant refuse 😉
Thats the last bit of our comunication :
 
Posts
7,904
Likes
35,856
I really dont know what his motivation is. But i guess he is planning to keep the watch, unless somebody makes him an offer he cant refuse 😉
Thats the last bit of our comunication :

The BS meter is tipping off the scale with this one...
 
Posts
1,301
Likes
2,575
But, if I recall the story correctly, the OP offered to buy the watch back if the buyer wasn't happy with it AFTER he saw it for sale online - but the new owner didn't take him up on the offer because it's all about the money.
Yeah, I’m not certain about the chronology of all this. OP wrote on page 1: “About 1,5 month ago i asked him, that if he at some point gets tired of the watch i would gladly buy it back. He said, "Will do !"”
I assumed from what OP wrote that this dialogue took place before the ad was posted on C24 because he told the buyer “if at some point...”.
 
Posts
1,650
Likes
5,222
Yeah, I’m not certain about the chronology of all this. OP wrote on page 1: “About 1,5 month ago i asked him, that if he at some point gets tired of the watch i would gladly buy it back. He said, "Will do !"”
I assumed from what OP wrote that this dialogue took place before the ad was posted on C24 because he told the buyer “if at some point...”.
Yes thats about right.
Edited:
 
Posts
4,637
Likes
9,349
If I wanted to, why not? There is nothing special about the OF.

Hi @oinkitt

That is where your wrong , not incorrect but wrong.

The OF is a community. Not a sales stage or flea market.

if you can’t see that maybe this is NOT the flea market for you . ( sorry typo on my iphone).

please think about this before you post again ... maybe you don’t want to be a part of a community ...

Bill Sohne
Edited:
 
Posts
590
Likes
1,223
I really dont know what his motivation is. But i guess he is planning to keep the watch, unless somebody makes him an offer he cant refuse 😉
Thats the last bit of our comunication :

I totally agree with keeping watches within the OF community when possible, but the watch is sold now - is it still appropriate to be pestering the buyer if he chooses to resell it? The deal is done, he can do what he wants with it, lesson learned.
 
Posts
1,650
Likes
5,222
I totally agree with keeping watches within the OF community when possible, but the watch is sold now - is it still appropriate to be pestering the buyer if he chooses to resell it? The deal is done, he can do what he wants with it, lesson learned.
I didnt start the thread, neither was it my intention to "pester" anybody. If you saw one of my earlier comments, thats exactly what i am saying, i dont blame him, he can do whatever he wants with it.
In fact the buyer was the one asking me some qustions about papers and service and so on, like a week after the deal was done. I even helped him translate the papers.
There have been questions and suggestions here from forum members and i felt like responsing somehow. But i also would not mind if this story would just be closed at this point, since any further discussions are probably pointless anyways.