Why do almost all vintage Rolex watches being sold...

Posts
465
Likes
996
...have almost perfect lume while it seems near possible to find a vintage Speedmaster with decent lume?
 
Posts
907
Likes
2,485
My thoughts also... I understand a Rolex as it was more expensive when bought new, that it was more looked after than a Omega “tool watch”. But nevertheless, i’ve seen more nice dials with perfect lume of Rolex than of Omegas.
 
Posts
1,579
Likes
3,770
- rolexes are more waterproof (screwed crown, no pushers)
- service dials, fake dials, relumed dials, ...
 
Posts
16,741
Likes
47,359
Big difference in the amount of lume on each watch.

( just googled 1969 for Omega and Rolex and stole the pictures )

A thin strip



Compared to


Not forgetting one being a dive watch and one being a sports timer
Edited:
 
Posts
980
Likes
2,091
- rolexes are more waterproof (screwed crown, no pushers)
- service dials, fake dials, relumed dials, ...

This.
Even their dressier series (Datejust, Oysterdate etc.) were study and with high water resistance of that time.
 
Posts
367
Likes
463
@boogedyboo
I certainly get the gist of what you're saying, still there are many examples of sought after, vintage Rolex sports watches that have less than perfect (original) lume. [Coincidentally, just look at the 5513 from HQ Milton, posted above]. Likewise, there are lots of examples to be found of vintage Speedmasters with intact, nicely patina'd (original) lume.